2016/08/03 Council Agenda Packet

.r • 1 2 H. The EVR1 —City of Everett proposal is consistent with and advances the GPP,in 3 .particular LU PolicY1.A.7,which provides that designated forest and agricultural 4 lands shall not be included within a UGA unless the designated lende are maintained 5 as natural resource lands and a TDR/PDR pregrare has been enacted by the city or 6 the county. The proposal site will continue to be designated RCF,a flatfeet resource 7 plan designation,and both the city and the county have adopted TDR programs. 8 9 I, Procedural requitefuents. to 11 1. This proposal is a Type 8 tegielative adlon pursuant to SCC 31273.010, 12 13 2. State Enviteireeentel Policy Act(SPA)requirements with reaped to this non- 14 project action have been satisfied through the completion of a Draft EIS is issued on September 8,2014,and a Final EIS Issued on June 3,2015. 16 17 3. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.105(1), a notice of intent to adopt this ordinance 18. was transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce for 19 distribution to state agencies on December 17,2014.. 20 21 4. The public participation process used in the adoption of this ordinance has 22 complied with all applicable requirements of the Giv1A and the SCC. 23 24 5. The Washington State Attorney General fast issued an advisory '25 memorandum,as required by ROW 35.70A.370,in December of 2006 enUtled 20 'Advisory Memorandum:Avoiding Unconstitutional Takings of Private 27 Property"to help local governments avoid the unconetitutlonal taking of 28 Ovate property.The process outlined in the State Attorney General's 2006 29 advisory memorandum was used by Snohomish County in objectively 30 evaluating the amendments proposed by this OraleTICD. 31 32 J. The ordinance is consistent with the record. 33 34 1. No inconsistencies between the proposed amendments and the GMACP 35 • elements or development regulations hays been identified. 37 2, The proposal complies with all requirements of the GMA, Including:the 38 requirement In RCW 36.70A070 that a plan be en internally calistilBnt 39 docu_mert the requirements le RCW 36.70A.130(1)(d)that any amendment 40 to a comprehensive plan shall conform to the GMA and that any amendment 41 to development regulations shall implement the comprehensive plan; the zr2, requirement in RCW 38,70/030(2)that a county consider comprehensive 43 plan amendments no more frequently than once per year;and the mei twice No.1+131 RELATING TO The GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT,ADOPTING FUTURE SAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MENDING THE 7..ONINO MAP TO P4PLEME4T CHANGES TO THE FUTUTa LAND USE MAP.AND REVISING THE SOUTHWEST URBAN GROWTH AREA(EVRI-CITY OF EVERETT)-4 Page 25 of 37 City Council Staff Report Smith Island Municipal Annexation 8.10.2016 3 2