Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 2 H. The EVR1 City of Everett proposal is oonsistent with and advances the GPP,in • <br /> 3 .particular LU Poricy IA?,which provides that designated forest and agricultural <br /> - 4 lands shall not be included within a UGA unless the designated lands are maintained <br /> 5 as natural resource lands aid a TDR/PDR program has been enacted by the city or <br /> 6 the county. The proposal site will continuo to be designated RCF,a natural resource <br /> 7 plan designaton,and both the city and the county have adopted TDR program. <br /> 9 Procedural requirements_ <br /> 11 1. This proposal is a Type 3 legislative aallon pursuant to SCC 3033.010. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 2. Slate Envirementai Paw Act(SEPA)requirements with respect to this non- <br /> . <br /> 14 project action have been satisfied through the completion of a Draft EIS <br /> 15 issued on September 8,2014,and a Final EIS issued on June 3,2015. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 3. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.105(1), a notice of Intent to adopt this+NO1E181100, <br /> is was transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce for <br /> 19 distribution to state agencies on December 17,2014. <br /> 20 <br /> • 21 4. The public participation process used In the adoption of this ordinance has <br /> 22 complied with all applicable requirements of the GFAA and the SCC. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 5. The Washington State Attorney General last issued an advisory <br /> 25 memorandum,as required by RCW 36.70A.370,in December of 2t00 matted <br /> 25 gAdvisary?Amaranth=Avoiding Unconstitutional Takings of Private <br /> 27 Property to help lotgovernments avoid the unconstitutional taking of <br /> 28 private property.The process outlined in the State Attorney General's 2000 <br /> 29 advisory memorandum was used by Snohomish County in abjectly* <br /> 30 evaluating the amendments proposed by this ordnnce, <br /> 31 <br /> 32 J. The ordinance is consistent with the record. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 1. No inconsistencies batmen the proposed amendments and tha GMACP <br /> 35 elements or development regulations hayo been identified. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 2. The proposal cOrnplIOS with ail requirements of the GM,inotucring:the <br /> 38 requirement in RCW 36.70A.070 that a plan.be an internally corisiitent <br /> 39 document the requirements in.RCW 36.70A.130(1)(d)that any amendment <br /> 40 to a cinpreheasivet plan shall conform to the GIVA and that any amendment <br /> 41 to development regulations shall implement the comprehensive plan;the <br /> 42 requirement in RCW 38.70A.130(2)that a county consider compiebenske <br /> 43 plan amendments no more frequently than once per year;and the <br /> ona Wee NO.14431 <br /> RELATING TOME GROWTH MANAGEMENT Act ADOPTNG <br /> FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS TO ME SNOtiOMS-H <br /> COUNTY GROW11-1LiANAGEL4MT ACT COMPFZEHENstvE KAN. <br /> A.k0WiNGz0400 MAP TO IMpLEMINT CRANGES TO <br /> TEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP,AND REVISING THE SOUTHWEST <br /> URBAN GROYMi AREA(EVR I-CITY OF EVERE11)-4 <br /> • <br /> Page 25 of 37 <br /> City Council Staff Report Smith island Municipal Annexation 8.10.2016 <br /> 44 <br />