My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Snohomish County 9/2/2016
>
Contracts
>
Agreement
>
Interlocal Agreements
>
Snohomish County 9/2/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 7:10:14 AM
Creation date
9/13/2016 11:37:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Snohomish County
Approval Date
9/2/2016
Council Approval Date
6/15/2016
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Jim Miller
Subject / Project Title
Smith Island Restoration
Tracking Number
0000272
Total Compensation
$683,900.00
Contract Type
Agreement
Contract Subtype
Interlocal Agreements
Retention Period
6 Years Then Destroy
Imported from EPIC
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County in accordance with the proportionate share percentage set forth in <br /> Section 1.3 of this Exhibit as provided in subparagraph 1.1.2 below. <br /> 1.1.2 Pre-construction costs after December 31, 2012 (Pre-Construction Phase <br /> Costs). The Proportionate share of the Pre-Construction Phase Costs shall <br /> be paid for by the City on a time and expense basis, as costs are incurred <br /> by the County. An additional 15%Administration fee shall apply to <br /> County labor. An estimate of the Pre-Construction Phase Costs is given in <br /> the Exhibit B Table and costs include but are not limited to the following: <br /> (a) SEPA review—All work towards the final EIS, and technical work in <br /> response to an appeal. SEPA review costs will not include legal <br /> services in the event of an appeal, or defending the EIS. <br /> (b) The following design and analysis: <br /> (1) Modeling <br /> (2) Puget Sound Energy pipeline (PSE)protection <br /> 1.1.3 The City's Proportionate share of the County's Construction Project <br /> Management Costs for Shared Work shall be paid for by the City on an <br /> actual incurred time and expense basis, as costs are incurred by the <br /> County. An estimate of the Construction Project Management costs is <br /> included in the Exhibit B Table and these costs include,but are not limited <br /> to the following: <br /> (a) Project Administration <br /> (b) Construction Management, including but not limited to: <br /> (1) PSE protection <br /> The estimated Construction Project Management Costs shall be based on <br /> 15% of the Engineer's estimated construction cost for PSE protection. An <br /> additional 15%Administration fee shall apply to County labor. The <br /> summary cost estimate of Construction Project Management Costs in the <br /> Exhibit B Table is based on 90% design. <br /> 1.1.4 Project Construction <br /> The City's Proportionate share of total Construction Costs for Shared <br /> Work, including contingency, shall be paid for by the City on a payments <br /> to contractor basis, as costs are incurred by the County, and as provided in <br /> Section 1.4.5 of this Exhibit. A Construction Force Account fund in the <br /> amount of$100,000 is included in the Exhibit B Table. However,the <br /> parties further acknowledge that the actual bid amount plus 10% <br /> contingency may be different than the amount in Exhibit B. If the City's <br /> calculated proportionate share based on the bid award amount plus 10% <br /> contingency exceeds the total City share in the Exhibit B Table, the City's <br /> payment obligation shall not exceed the total City share in the Exhibit B <br /> Table without further amendment to this Agreement. The Construction <br /> Costs include but are not limited to the following: <br /> INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR <br /> IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMITH ISLAND RESTORATION PROJECT PAGE 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.