Laserfiche WebLink
172, EMC 15.16, and the specific planned action ordinance relating to the proposed <br /> project, and (ii) mitigation elements of the planned action are implemented. <br /> 5.2 An existing traffic analysis may be adopted or used by the City to determine an <br /> applicant's responsibility for transportation improvements, in accordance with project review <br /> and SEPA procedures for the use of and reliance upon existing environmental documents. <br /> 5.3 Proposed projects on which a traffic analysis is not prepared conform to the provisions of <br /> section 11 of this chapter. <br /> Section 6: Scope of traffic analysis <br /> The traffic analysis should include the following, as further specified in this ordinance: (a) traffic <br /> generated by the project; (b) transportation effects of the project; and (c) measures to avoid or <br /> otherwise mitigate adverse transportation effects of the project, which consist of transportation <br /> system improvements and/or local transportation improvements. <br /> Section 7: Impact analysis <br /> Analysis of traffic generation and transportation effects shall use the following methodology: <br /> 7.1 Study area. The study area shall be defined as the area that includes all of the <br /> transportation system that is projected to be used by a minimum threshold of 50 new peak hour <br /> trips. The study area shall not be limited to the City limits, but shall include the county, state, <br /> and other City roadways. For projects that have region wide traffic impacts, the City Traffic <br /> Engineer may limit the scope of the study area. Region wide impacts will be determined on a <br /> case by case basis in consultation with the county, state, tribal, and other appropriate <br /> jurisdictions. <br /> 7.2 Horizon year. The traffic analysis shall include impacts for the future horizon year. The <br /> horizon year shall generally be based on the year the proposed project is expected to be <br /> completed, but shall be: <br /> 1. The horizon year shall generally be based on the year the proposed project is expected to <br /> be completed. <br /> 2. The horizon year shall be no earlier than the final year of the City's adopted capital <br /> improvement plan (6 years). <br /> 3. The horizon year shall be no earlier than 6 years from the date of the completed project <br /> application. <br /> 4. If a project will generate new traffic for more than 6 years, the horizon year shall be the <br /> planning horizon for the land use and transportation elements in the comprehensive plan <br /> that is in effect at the time of the complete application (i.e., the years remaining between <br /> the time of the complete application and the end of the planning horizon used for the <br /> adopted comprehensive plan). <br /> -3- <br />