My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016/10/01 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2016/10/01 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 12:00:31 PM
Creation date
10/13/2016 12:00:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/1/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 1, 2016 <br /> REVIEW OF DRAFT MATERIALS <br /> The next discussion focused on the draft document "Envision Everett." <br /> President Murphy suggested the committee review other cities' vision <br /> processes for context. Other suggestions included mapping urban growth <br /> areas, assessing the challenges created in recent years, evaluating <br /> technology changes and other transformative developments, and <br /> establishing a standard for evaluating the plan. <br /> ENVISION EVERETT COMMITTEE <br /> Council members and Ms. Norton-Arnold addressed the structure of <br /> meetings for the committee. Council members stated that the first kickoff <br /> meeting should be a brainstorming session and to consider the dates and <br /> times of the future meetings to include fluid schedules and have the <br /> committee members plan meeting times for the inclusion of a variety of <br /> applicants. <br /> Recruitment plans were discussed to ensure the committee has a diverse <br /> background that includes reaching out to community groups to engage <br /> different cultures. Council members made suggestions on how to include <br /> input by citizens outside the committee including online surveys, hosting <br /> public comment, and using the neighborhood associations to relay <br /> information. <br /> Bob Bolerjack, Administration, asked for Council's input into the number of <br /> committee members and any suggestions for recruitment. Staff suggested <br /> 14 committee members, excluding City staff. Council members stated the <br /> importance of having diversity among the committee members is more <br /> important than the number of members and having more than 14 <br /> members might better represent the voices of the community. In addition, <br /> another suggestion was to possibly allow committee members from <br /> outside city limits, who have a vested interest in the city, such as business <br /> owners or citizens of urban growth areas that may be annexed in the <br /> future. <br /> 310 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.