Laserfiche WebLink
777X Static Test Building I 3 <br /> ■ Sand. A layer of medium dense to very dense sand with silt to silty sand was encountered in all of <br /> the borings at the surface or underlying the asphalt with the exception of boring HC-8. This layer <br /> extended to depths between 8 and 32 feet bgs. This layer deepens to the west of the site and is <br /> thickest at the location of the stockpiles and extended to 32 feet below the exiting surface in the <br /> southwest corner of the site. Boring HC-9 had comparatively higher organic content within the <br /> sand, including a zone with peat from 10 to 14 feet bgs. <br /> ■ Silty Sand(Glacial Till). A layer of native glacial till was encountered below the asphalt road in <br /> borings HC-8 and beneath the sand in the remaining borings. This layer consists of very dense, <br /> silty sand with variable gravel content. The Standard Penetration Test(SPT) blow counts in this <br /> layer were consistently greater than 50 blows per foot(bpf). This layer has been delineated as the <br /> bearing layer at the site and elevation contours of this layer are included on Figure 2. <br /> Groundwater Conditions <br /> Due to the mud rotary drilling method used, groundwater conditions were not readily apparent during <br /> drilling. Boring HC-7 was left open overnight to allow the ground water level to stabilize within the <br /> borehole. The groundwater at this location was measured to be at a depth of 9.4 feet bgs,or <br /> approximately at elevation 557 feet. Based on this limited quantity of groundwater data,we <br /> recommend using a slightly higher groundwater level of 560 feet for design of retaining walls. <br /> Standing water was observed on site in the drainage ditch to the north of the site along 94th Street SW <br /> and at an approximate elevation of 565 feet in the stormwater pond on the southwest corner of the <br /> site at the time of drilling. <br /> Note that measured groundwater levels represent the times indicated. Fluctuations in groundwater <br /> levels may occur due to variations in rainfall,temperature,seasons, and other factors. It is important <br /> that the contractor provides contingencies for dealing with perched groundwater on this project. <br /> GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS AND <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> This section presents our recommendations and conclusions for geotechnical aspects of design. Our <br /> recommendations are based on our current understanding of the project and the subsurface <br /> conditions interpreted from explorations at and near the site by Hart Crowser and others. If the <br /> nature or location of the facilities is different than we have assumed,we should be notified so we can <br /> review,change, and/or confirm our recommendations. <br /> Earthquake Engineering <br /> This section provides a brief overview of potential seismic hazards and our recommendations to <br /> develop the code-based seismic design parameters. <br /> ■s <br /> ALAI 19106-01 <br /> HAWOZOwsME May 29,2015 <br />