Ordinance 2766-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

. ,x Findings &Conclusions 2/25/04 Page 2 of 5 Management Policies 1. Give priority to maritime uses and services, and encourage a mix of compatible water-dependent and associated water-related and marina support industrial-and recreational uses, and water-oriented commercial uses. Non- water oriented commercial and office uses shall only be permitted when they provide public access and are part of a master plan guided mixed-use project that includes water-dependent uses. Table 5.1 Shoreline Use Table(See attachment B to this document.) (Page 5-2 of the SMP indicate that non-water oriented commercial uses are not allowed in the Maritime shoreline environment as denoted by an;"X". The "X" has been replaced with "P 15" which means the use is permitted and references the new footnote:) '154ryti 15. Non-water dependent and non-water oriented uses are allowed in the North Marina Planned Development Overlay—WC zone area only, subject to provisions of applicable City regulations.-` td'the Development Agreement and Design Standards and Guidelines inaffectio athe,.area. Amendment History, Review Process: The st bmitta1'indicates-that the Port of Everett conducted numerous outreach;Meetings regarding he North Marina Redevelopment starting in early 2001. The record:shows that tie City held i ieetings with affected neighbors on May 27th June 9th and June 26`h o 2003. The,record also sows that the Planning Commission held a hih workshop on May 20tand open hearings on June 17 , July 1st, and July 15th of 2003. An Affidavit of Publication was suhm tied that4.�tates the Planning Commission published notice of the May 20th and:June 17th phearings in The Herald o.n May 5, 2003. The City Council is reported to`have''helda ut# c public heanng and passed the Ordinance 2713-03 on September 17, 2003, which authorized','SM to forward the proposed amendments to Ecology for approval. The proposed SMP amendments were received by Ecology for state review on October 20, 2003. The submittal contained a signed ordinance, clearly identifiable amended text, a summary and explanation of the amendmrents, evidence of compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and copies of c mments received during the local government review including names and addresses. ` t Notice of the state comment period was distributed to state task force members and interested parties identified by the City on October 28, 2003, in compliance with the requirements of WAC 173-26-120.The state comment period began on October 28th and continued through December 1, 2003. Ecology did not hold a public hearing. Three comments on the proposed amendments were received, only one of which had negative comments. Deborah Knutson of the Snohomish County Economic Development Council, and John Shaw of Westview Building LLC each expressed support for the proposal. Barbara Hardman wrote a letter in opposition to the project.