Laserfiche WebLink
2.2.1 Suitability Criteria 19 <br /> 2.2.2 Restoration Goals and Opportunities 21 <br /> 2.2.2.1 Restoration Goals 21 <br /> 2.2.2.2 Restoration Opportunities 21 <br /> 2.2.2.3 Public Access 22 <br /> 2.3 Summary of Alternatives 23 <br /> 2.3.1 No Action Alternative 24 <br /> 2.3.2 Alternative 1: Maximum Recreation 25 <br /> 2.3.3 Alternative 2: Stakeholder Preferred Alternative 25 <br /> 2.3.4 Alternative 3: Maximum Habitat Restoration 26 <br /> 2.4 Alternative Outcomes 27 <br /> 2.4.1 Land Use Areas by Alternative 27 <br /> 2.4.2 Planning Level Costs by Alternative 28 <br /> 2.4.3 Outcomes of the Alternatives 29 <br /> 2.4.3.1 No Action Alternative 29 <br /> 2.4.3.2 Alternative 1: Maximum Recreation Alternative 29 <br /> 2.4.3.3 Alternative 2: Stakeholder Preferred Alternative 29 <br /> 2.4.3.4 Alternative 3: Maximum Restoration Alternative 30 <br /> 3 RESTORATION AND LAND USE CONCEPTS 31 <br /> 3.1 Guiding Principles 31 <br /> 3.2 Selection of the Subarea Plan Elements 32 <br /> 3.3 Subarea Plan Features 32 <br /> 3.3.1 Subarea Plan Outcomes 36 <br /> 3.3.1.1 Proposed Habitat Types 36 <br /> 3.3.1.2 Ecological Functional Improvements 43 <br /> 3.3.1.3 SEWIP Salmon Overlay Scores 44 <br /> 3.3.1.4 Subarea Plan Planning Implications 46 <br /> 3.3.2 Restoration Potential/Feasibility 47 <br /> 3.3.2.1 Restoration Feasibility 47 <br /> 4 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES 51 <br /> 4.1.1 Goals 51 <br /> 4.1.2 Objectives 51 <br /> 4.1.3 Policies 52 <br /> Draft Subarea Plan June 2009 <br /> Everett Marshland ii 070346-01 <br />