Laserfiche WebLink
Plan,and coordinated with Snohomish County,the Marshland Flood Control District,the <br /> Coordinated Diking Council,Natural Resources Conservation Service,affected utilities,BNSF, <br /> and property owners." <br /> Ed Husmann,President, Snohomish County Farm Bureau, 13420 339th Ave SE, Sultan,WA <br /> 98294 <br /> Comment#2: Of the 1065.3 acres total Marshlands acreage; a large portion are designated <br /> agricultural lands. Both the City of Everett and Snohomish County are obliged by the Growth <br /> Management Act to de.Fignate and protect agricultural lands. See, RCW 39.70A.030(2), RCW <br /> 39.70A.020(8), RCW 39.70A.060, RCW 39.70A.070(1). Hence this plan to destroy designated <br /> agricultural land is most clearly violative of the GMA. <br /> City of Everett Response: Both Snohomish County and the City have a wide variety of legal <br /> mandates that have to be balanced in land use regulations,including,but not limited to the <br /> following:. <br /> • RCW 39.70A.020(8)(referenced in the comment)also requires that fisheries industries <br /> be maintained and enhanced. <br /> • <br /> • RCW 36.70A.060(4)states that"Forest land and agricultural land located within urban <br /> growth areas shall not be designated by a county or city as forest land or agricultural land <br /> of long-term commercial significance under RCW 36.70A.170 unless the city or county <br /> has enacted a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights." <br /> WAC 365-190-050(1)states that"Counties and Cities must have a program for the <br /> transfer or purchase of development rights prior to designating agricultural resource lands <br /> in urban growth areas."The City has not adopted such a program for agricultural lands, <br /> so is precluded from designating the portion of the Subarea in the urban growth area for <br /> commercial agriculture of long-term significance. <br /> • WAC 365-196-730 Federal authorities. <br /> (1) Counties and cities drafting or amending comprehensive plans and development <br /> regulations under the act should consider the effects of federal authority over land or <br /> resource use within the planning area,including: <br /> (a)Treaties with Native Americans; <br /> (c)Federal statutes or regulations imposing national standards; <br /> (d)Federal permit programs and plans; <br /> (2)Examples of such federal standards,permit programs and plans are: <br /> (g)Recovery plans and the prohibition on taking list species under the Endangered <br /> Species Act; <br /> • WAC 173-26-186 Governing principles of the guidelines (Shoreline Master Program <br /> Guidelines). <br /> • 173-26-201. Comprehensive process to prepare or amend shoreline master <br /> programs. <br /> 4 <br />