My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 3360-13
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 3360-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 10:24:55 AM
Creation date
11/10/2016 10:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
3360-13
Date
12/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E. An offender receiving an exclusion notice longer than seven days may seek a hearing to <br /> have the exclusion notice rescinded, the period of exclusion shortened, or the areas of exclusion <br /> reduced. The hearing examiner shall be an elected or pro tempore Everett municipal court judge, <br /> unless the mayor designates another as hearing examiner. The request for a hearing shall be <br /> delivered to the parks director or postmarked no later than seven days after the issuance date of <br /> the exclusion notice. The request for hearing shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by a <br /> copy of the exclusion notice on which the hearing is sought. The hearing should occur within <br /> seven days after the parks director receives the request for hearing. The parks director or his/her <br /> designee shall take reasonable steps to notify the offender of the date, time, and place of the <br /> hearing. <br /> F. At the hearing,the violation must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence in order to <br /> uphold the exclusion notice. If the exclusion notice was issued because of the alleged violation of <br /> any criminal law,the offender need not be charged,tried, or convicted for the exclusion notice to <br /> be upheld. The exclusion notice establishes a prima facie case that the offender committed the <br /> violation as described. The hearing examiner shall consider a sworn report or a declaration made <br /> under penalty of perjury, written by the individual who issued the exclusion notice, without <br /> further evidentiary foundation. The certifications authorized in Rule 6.13 of the Criminal Rules <br /> for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction shall be considered without further evidentiary foundation. <br /> The hearing examiner may consider information that would not be admissible under the evidence <br /> rules in a court of law but which the hearing examiner considers relevant and trustworthy. <br /> G. If the violation is proved, the exclusion notice shall be upheld; but upon good cause shown, <br /> the hearing examiner may shorten the duration of the exclusion or reduce the areas covered by <br /> the exclusion. If the violation is not proved by a preponderance of the evidence, the hearing <br /> examiner shall rescind the exclusion. If the hearing examiner rescinds an exclusion, the <br /> exclusion shall not be considered a prior exclusion for purposes of subsection B of this section. <br /> H. The decision of the hearing examiner is final. An offender seeking judicial review of <br /> hearing examiner's decision must file an application for a writ of review in the Snohomish <br /> County superior court with fifteen days of the date of that decision. <br /> I. The exclusion shall remain in effect during the pendency of any administrative or judicial <br /> proceeding. <br /> J. No determination of facts made by a person conducting a hearing under this section shall <br /> have any collateral estoppel effect on a subsequent criminal prosecution or civil proceeding and <br /> shall not preclude litigation of those same facts in a subsequent criminal prosecution or civil <br /> proceeding. <br /> 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.