Laserfiche WebLink
5. Implementation <br /> Because of the substantial cost and level of effort needed to construct street improvements, <br /> implementation of this streetscape plan will necessarily be accomplished over time through a <br /> variety of measures. Therefore, this streetscape improvement plan is designed to allow <br /> implementation to take place in several ways. Some streets will be improved by City-initiated <br /> comprehensive street improvement projects. In other instances, the City and/or property owner <br /> may improve a key intersection or portion of a street, such as a curb bulb or median. Street <br /> improvements will also be accomplished as part of requirements for new development. Finally, <br /> it is suggested that some systems, such as lighting or street trees, be installed on a street <br /> without demolition and reconstruction of the street itself. <br /> Each of these implementation measures carries advantages and disadvantages. <br /> Comprehensive street improvements, in which the City designs and constructs improvements <br /> along a whole downtown street segment such as was accomplished on Hewitt and Colby <br /> Avenues, generally provides the greatest impact, can coordinate and upgrade old street <br /> systems, and provides cost efficiencies due to scale, planning, and financing. However, the <br /> high cost of such a project can be daunting. Therefore, such full "make-over" projects should be <br /> reserved for those streets where: <br /> • Such improvements would provide exceptional public benefit in terms of circulation <br /> (especially pedestrian and transit), amenities, support for other public facilities, and/or <br /> stimulus for desired private development, <br /> • Property owners benefiting from street improvements contribute to funding the project <br /> through a mechanism such as a local improvement district (L.I.D.), and/or <br /> • The street's engineering systems require replacement so that streetscape improvements <br /> can be added at modest cost increases to the total project budget. <br /> Streets that merit high priority for comprehensive improvements are Rucker Avenue (because of <br /> the City's desire to foster a residential neighborhood) and Wetmore Avenue (because of the <br /> new park, Performing Arts Center, government offices, large pedestrian volumes, and transit <br /> route). <br /> It is recommended that the City consider augmenting public funds through appropriate property <br /> owner assessments for such projects. The extent of private contributions can be determined <br /> depending on the amount of stimulus the City wishes to provide local developers. If property <br /> owners contribute through an assessment, they would be relieved of street improvement costs <br /> when they redevelop. <br /> Relative to their cost, intersection improvements, especially curb bulbs, can provide large <br /> benefits in terms of pedestrian safety, traffic calming, and visual appearance. This plan <br /> recommends that the City establish an annual fund for intersection improvements, augmented <br /> with funds from parking meter revenues and other sources. Figure 17 indicates intersections <br /> with high priority for curb bulbs. Also, streetscape improvements such as curb bulbs and <br /> Everett Downtown Streetscape Plan 43 <br />