Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> Meg Haley �Gl!� �U`� <br /> From: Bill Bruce <br /> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 3:34 PM <br /> To: Kirk Brooks; Tom Thetford; Mark Sadler; Meg Haley; Loren Postma <br /> ��, Bob Keller: Gordon Witcner <br /> Sub�act�. . 11625 Airp�rt Rd. <br /> To All, <br /> There are some importani eleTents to keep m mind when retrofitting 11625 Airport Rd. These elements may generalty be <br /> applied ro all retrofitting; but, each facility is a unique situation that needs the cooperetion of all parties tha!need to be <br /> involved. <br /> All fireservices with Single Check Device(SCD) need to be eventually upgraded to a State approved backflow preventer <br /> appropriate to the degree of hazard.. A L.uble Check Valve Assembly(DCVA) may be dsed inside provided that the Ciry <br /> of Everett's sp�cifications are met. In the case of the DCVA, the SCD must remain because of the need for a metec It is <br /> slso preferable that an engin2er approve the arrangement to assure that there is not too much head loss.. <br /> However, it is preferable that a Double Check Detector Assembly(OCDA)be used whether it is inside and the SCD is <br /> taken out or the SCD is replaced with a DCDA outside in a vault. The consensus seems to be that if the building is further <br /> than 70 feet from the water main,the DCDA should always be outside in a vault. <br /> I am writing this because the ratrofitting of fireservices is the most controversiat in cross-connection because of the <br /> perceived low health risk and high cost. It is important though, because according[o the American Backflow Prevention <br /> Association(ABPA) 1999 survey, 43%of reporting systems had backflow incidents relating to fire systems <br /> I am more than willing to have comments and additions to this email and thank you for your attention. <br /> Bill Bruce, CCS <br /> i <br />