Laserfiche WebLink
.' <br />. <br />Blanchard, Will <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Subject: <br />Hi Will, <br />"� P�2�m� � s�l <br />u <br />Grace Pollard <GPollard@everettwa.gov> <br />Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:49 PM <br />Blanchard, Will <br />RE: Norton Substation <br />� ������T����{ <br />��l �eb�- C�? � <br />You are correct in understanding that Land Use Manager Gerry Ervine waved the need for a review process for a special <br />land use permit for the proposed Norton Sub-station upgrade. Mr. Ervine considers the project to be routine <br />maintenance of an existing utility. <br />The Planning Department is not concerned at this time with requiring any additional setbacks or landscape <br />requirements. That is not to say that any future upgrades or changes to the property wouldn't trigger additional <br />requirements. <br />As far as needed permits go, a building permit for the fence is all that is required. <br />Sincerely, <br />Grace Pollard <br />Assistant Planner <br />From: Blanchard, Will [mailto:WABlanchard@SNOPUD.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, July 08, Z015 10:47 AM <br />To: Grace Pollard <br />Subject: Norton Substation <br />Hello Grace, <br />Stepped out of my cube for a few minutes and missed your call. <br />That's good news O <br />I understand the City (per Jerry Irvine) then has waved the land use permit requirements. <br />When I'd talked with Teresa it seemed a special use permit was required to use the parcel as a substation. This then <br />absolves that requirement and we are good to continue the use under the existing permit? <br />Also the landscaping and any setback issues are resolved? <br />As far as a building permit I was expecting to submit for the wall but that's about it. Is that in line with City's <br />expectations? <br />Thanks, <br />Will <br />From: Microsoft Outlook On Behalf Of 4252577000 <br />Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:06 AM <br />To: Blanchard, Will <br />Subject: Voice Mail from 4252577000 (1 minute and 3 seconds) <br />1 � <br />Ya5 <br />