Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Pepe Rctaining Wall <br />Everett, Washington <br />� <br />NGA File No. 916915 <br />April 27, 2015 <br />Page 6 <br />The Transitional Bed soi] interpreted to form the core of the steep slopes are considered stable with <br />respect to deep-seated slope failures. All steep slopes have the potential for shallow sloughing failures <br />during seismic events. During our initial site visit, we observed evidence of slope instability to the south <br />of the existing residence. A retaining wall may be needed on that side to prevent future sliding. <br />Erosion Hazard <br />The critcria used for determination of erosion hazar�d areas include soil type, slope gradient, vegetation <br />cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion sensitivity is relatcd to the vegetative cover and the <br />speciiic surface soil types, which are related to the underlying geologic soil units. The Soil Sut•vev of <br />Snohomish Countv Area, Washin�ton, by the Soi] Conservation Service (SCS) was reviewed to <br />deter�nine the erosion hazard of the on-site soils. The site s�irface soils were classified using the SCS <br />classitication system as Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 70 percent slopes. "1'hese soils are <br />listed as having a moderate to high erosion hazard. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />1t� is our opinion that the wall has serious issues ai�d failed due to a coinbina�tion of factors including the <br />stress rods detaching froir� wall, picrs, and the deadman anchor; poor till material behind the wall; and <br />poor drainage of Yhc housc and property. Also, the plastic wal] lagging has deteriorated. There is <br />evidence of ground settlement in walkways, the garage, and a post supporting the roof due to the tailure <br />of thc wall and thc wall backfill. A structural engineer will nced to evaluate the wall and fully <br />understand the as-built conditions in order to decide if the wall can be saved and a repair implemented. <br />(f the structural engineer decides th�t the wall can be fiaed, we have provided design reco�r�mendations <br />and parameters in the Retaining Wall Repair or Replacement s�ibsection of this report. I l� it is deemed <br />that the wall cannot be repaired, we should be contacted to discuss options for a new retaining wall. <br />We observed a signifiicant severely leaning tree on the slope to tl�e so�itheast of the residence. This tree is <br />severely bowed and ]eaning towards the house. We recommend that this tree be evaluated by an arborist <br />and removed so it does not damage the house should it fail. The tree should be removed down to the <br />stump, but the st�>>�p should not be re��oved, as removing it wo�ild cause majoe slope instability. <br />NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />