Laserfiche WebLink
Intracorp E-3592-520 <br />September 23, 1998 Page 7 <br />There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic event at <br />this site: ground rupture, liquefactian, and ground motion response. <br />Ground Rupture: The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal <br />events, ranging in depth from thirty (301 to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these <br />deep events has not been documented to date. Therefore, it is our opinion, that the risk of <br />graund rupture during a strong motion seismic event is negligible. <br />Liauefaction: Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short <br />periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration resuits in the loss <br />of grain-to-grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave <br />as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size <br />distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt?; it must be loose to medium dense; <br />it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and <br />duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential <br />settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. <br />In our opinion, the dense to very dense soils underlying the site have a negligible liquefaction <br />potential. <br />Ground Motion Response: The 1997 UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force <br />procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the <br />encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion soil profile type Sp, Stiff Soil as defined in Table <br />16-J should be used to characterize the site soils. <br />Excavations and Slopes <br />The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances <br />should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for <br />construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied <br />and should not be inferred. <br />ln no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and <br />Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration, the <br />site soils expected to be encountered in excavations would be classified as Type C by OSHA. <br />As such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no <br />steeper than 1.5H:'1 V. If slopes of this inclination or flatter cannot be constructed, temporary <br />shoring may be necessary. This sharing will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, <br />and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we <br />will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. <br />Earth Consultante, Inc. <br />