Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Mr. Darren Peugh <br />January 19, 2004 <br />The soil conditions we observed at the hand-excavated test holes in the area of the water quality pond consisted of <br />dense, compacted silty sand with gravel fill. As we understand, this fill was placed for construction of the access <br />roadway. <br />The approximate location of the previously excavated test pits and our recent hand auger borings are shown on <br />Figure 2. Logs describing soil conditions observed are attached as Fib re 3. <br />GEOLOGIC HAZARDS <br />Seismic <br />The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3 as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). <br />Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC indicates that soil <br />type S� should be used in structural design. <br />Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in <br />water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine-grained <br />sands that are below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. <br />The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this <br />intergranular friction; thus, eliminating the soil's strength. <br />Based on the results of our study, in our opinion, there is no risk for soil liquefaction to occur at this site. <br />Slope Stability <br />Title 19, Chapter 37 of the Everett Municipal Code, categorizes slopes with gradients in excess of 40 percent as <br />geologically hazardous areas. The code requires that properties designated as geologically hazardous areas have <br />a standard buffer of 25 feet from the top, toe, and sides of the slope. <br />To evaluate the impact of the planned development on the stability of the slopes, we completed stability analyses <br />using the computer program WINSTABL on three slope cross-sections. These sections were located through the <br />southeast building corner, the east side of the building where the building foundation is about ten feet from the top <br />of the slope, and off the northeast site corner through the proposed water quality pond. The analyses were <br />performed for existing and post-construction conditions. The post-construction analyses included pseudostatic or <br />seismic analysis using a horizontal acceleration value of 0.17g to simulate loading during a seismic event. The <br />following tables summarize the results of the analyses listing the safety factors for the critical failure surfaces <br />generated by the analyses. <br />Southeast CoYner Slope <br />Conditions Analyzed Minimum Safet Factors <br />Static Pseudostatic <br />Existing conditions 1.54 1.10 <br />After construction 1.54 1.10 <br />Proj ect No. T-5471 <br />Page No. 3 <br />