Laserfiche WebLink
P <br /> i ' EDNIfl L. HOAARD ' <br /> i 510 Alverson Blvd. <br /> I Everett, WA 98201 <br /> November 24, 1980 <br /> Mr: Ed Wilbur <br /> Roard of Ad�ustm�nts <br /> City of Everett <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> Dear Mr. Wilbur: <br /> members�willrbe�personal'y observing ourmreasonPforSbuildingythisnfencer board <br /> 1) The portion ofrovedfbycthe�CityWfourfyearshagoack of the housa was <br /> graciously app <br /> 2� the back of�thenhouseht ftheeend ofethe house ontthesfrontssidefrom <br /> Each individual wants his privacy. This is all we are seeking as an Everett <br /> taxpayer. <br /> When we purchased our property, the fenced, <br /> Area Number 1 - was bordered by six 15 feet high Cedrus Deodoras, beautiful <br /> evergreen specimen trees. These trees were mysteriously cut <br /> down - the stumps only, remain under the azaleas. <br /> Area Number 2 - likewise was lined with Pink Dogwood which would be 15 feet <br /> tall by now, affording privacy to this area in question. One <br /> only remains, the others mysteriously died. <br /> Area Number 3 - between the front end of the house and the city property of <br /> Alverson Boulevard, has been �lanted by us, three years in <br /> succession, with Photinia - only because each year these <br /> �hrubs have mysterlously died. <br /> Now the point I wish to emphasize is that our property, had it been unmolested, <br /> the trees allowed Lo remain as the Nord landscape gardener's intended, we would <br /> have had no need for a fence at anyti�e. <br /> ustat aatimePintouralivesrwhenntbis wasrcertainlyVunnecessarynexpense stly to <br /> thepurihasenofdth9shpropertyr�nknownUtoius,hbut fairlyWcortm neknowledgedtoith <br /> many in Everett. <br /> We are prayerfully endeavoring to make an ugly situation tolerable, but feel the <br /> city should share some responsiSility with us. <br /> Re�s.pectfully, , <br /> C . - ' i � ���5'�.�,��� a �� -�� <br /> �a- �- �� ��—� � - <br /> ElizaKath R. Howard <br />