1002 ANGLE LN 2016-01-01 MF Import

BOl1RD OF AWU3TMBNT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDBR VARIIINCE NO. 9-90 Based upon the written request for a variance from the City�s zoninq code by: Everett Peninsula Investment Ronald K. Wheeler P.O. Box 564 Mukilteo, WA 98275 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant." For a varience from section 8, Front Yards, to allow conetrua- tion of a single femily structure on ench o! tha lollowinq threa parcels with a front setback less then tha tw�nty le�t raquired by coda. Thie same verience was grented by the eosrd o! Adjustmant on Juna 8, 19B8i however, building parmils w�r� not obteinad within one year of thet data and eo the verisnca expired. on the proparty commonly known ae: Percels 1 and ] of 81.� I8708115004 end Lota 37,38,39 end 40 of Hawitt Heights Addi- tion, all on the south eide of Angle Lena. The Boerd o! l�djuetment, followinq e public hasring on seid applicetion held on May 7, 1990, end further havinq r�view�d ell te�timony, mnkas tha followinq Findings, Conclusions and Order: ! �IMGS Alm CONCI.l13ION8s i Crit�rion Mo. i: Thet tha varience is nacessery because o! exceptionsl or ax- � ; traordinery circumatances reqerding the size, shapa, topoqraphy, or locetion of the subiact proparty= or tha lxs- tion ot a pre-exieting improvamant on tha subject prop�rty thet � contormed to the zoning coda in e!lect when the improvam�nt wa� constructed. a. F�(jd1II4: The subject property consists o! thrae eeparat� percals with extreme topograQhic chanqes. Each o! th� thraa lots hae a level area thnt varies lrom zaro to tw�n- ty-nine feat south oP the edqe of Angle Lane right o! wsy. The remainder of the lots drop oPf repidly to the botto' oP a steep ravine. The Applicant is proposing to utilize the level area on the front of each lot to provide beerings for footinqs, � garage slabs, driveways, and provide for oft-straet park- inq for twu cars. Because of the extreme slope of the lots, it will be necessary to construct the homes on pil- � ing foundations. Angle Lane has 4o feet of right of way and the 30 foot , street improvement utilizes only the northern portion of i the riqht of ay, so there is l0 feet of unimproved right of way abutting the eubject lots that will provide a set- , back from the street if the variances are qranted. b. conclusion: There are unusual circumstances applyinq to the subject lot because of the topography and the fact that there is unused right of way on Anqle Lane. I � �