1014 ANGLE LN 2016-01-01 MF Import

\ . '1 ' ' �•� � . 1 � I!1AY 09 1:1:i�i B011RD OF ADJUSTMEN�r ............ ................__........................ FINDINGS, CONCLU3IONS AND ORDSR C;17Y 111= CVLfi�1T VARIANCE HO. 9-90 Public Wuilcs Uept. Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning cude by: Everett Penineula investment Ronald K. Wheeler P.O. Box 564 Mukilteo, WA 98275 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant." For a variance from Section 8, Front Yards, to allow construc- tion of a sinqle family etructure on each of the followinq three parcels with a front setback less then the twanty feat required by code. This same veriance was grented by ths Board o! Adiustment on June e, 1988f however, building permite wara not obteined within one year of thet date and eo the variance expired. On the property commonly known as: Parcels 1 and 3 of BL71 N8708115004 and Lots 37,38,39 and 40 oP Hewitt Fieights Addi- tion, all on the south side of 1ingle Lnne. The 8oerd o! Adjustment, following a public hearinq on ssid applicntion held on Mey 7, 1990, and further hnving reviewad all teatimony, mekes the following Findings, Conclusions end Order: ' FIIIDINCB 1��D COMCLtil4IOM8: Criterion No. 1• That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- � treordinery circumstances regarding the size, shape, topoqrnphy, or location of the subject propertyt or the loca- tion of a pre-existinq �mprovement on tha subiect property thet conformad to the zoning code in effect when the improvaaent was constructed. a. Findina: The subject property consists of tt�ree separete parcels with extreme topographic chenqes. Eech o! the three lots hes a level aree thet variee from zero to twen- ty-nine Peet south of the edqe of Anqle Lane right oi way. The remninder of the lots drop off rapidly to the bottom of a steep ravine. , The Applicant is propoainq to utilize the leve.l area on the front of each lot to provide bearings for footings, garage sYaba, driveways, and provide for ofP-street perk- inq for two cars. Because of the extreme slope o! the lots, ±t will be necessary to construct the homes on pil- ing foundations. Angle Lane has 4o feet of right of way and the 3o foot street imp �vement utilizes only the northern portion of the riqht f ay, so there is 10 feet of unimproved right of way abutting the subject lots that will provide a set- back from the street if the varfances are granted. b. Conclusion: There are unusual circumstances applying to the subject lot because of the topography and the fact that there is unused right of way on Anqle Lane. i i I �