6611 ASSOCIATED BLVD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import

kli: PahaU.oni f)c��rlopmcnt Ruildin�s: Ncw Commcrcial Page I of 2 i Meg Haley From: Meg Haley Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3 01 PM I,�(�' 7 ��o V`{ (p To: Dave Tyler Subjeet: RE: Pana,toni Development Buildings A 8 R Mountain View Business Center That looks great Dave Thanksl -Mr.g From: Dave Tyler Sent; Frid,3y, ]uly 06, 2007 12:31 PM To: Meg Haley Subjeet: R[: Panattoni Developmenl Buildings: A & B Mountain View Business Cen[er Meg- I did some wordsmdhing and camc up wdh ihis v:hich Noidd be noted as a conddion on ihe final BSP map "A 30-fuot no-build easement musl be provided from tlie lot li�e on both Lols 1 and 2. The purpose of this requirement is to allow new construction of each separate building (A & B) with a consistent zero hour fire- resistance rating at the exterior wall, based on a 30 foot minimum fire separation distance from the property line, per Table G02 in the 2003 International Building Code." The no-build easement shall also be shown graphically as depicted on the preliminary binding site plan map. From: Meg Halcy Sent: Friday, luly 06, 2007 10:56 AM To: Dave Tylcr Subject: Panattoni Development Buildin9s: P, & B Moun[ain View Ousiness Center Dave, The customer P�a; requested ihat each of the two building�(A 8 B) be considered separate b�ildings, refernng to lhe no-bu8d easement between lhe binldings as part ol the binding site plan approval, see e-mad below from the Architect John L lacuna The Public Services/Permd Services Departmenl would hke lhe bindmg site plan to mc!ude, as a condition of approval, a 30 foot no-bwld ease.ment for each separele lot (1 & 2)(rom the p;operty line between lots created by lhe bindmy s te plan This binding :ondifion on each lot allows the new construchon of each seFarate building (A 8 8)wdh a consiste.nt zero hour fire- i�sistance ratiny at the extenor�vail based on a z0 fool mimmum fire separabon d�stance �rom the property line. per Table 602 m tl e 2003 In;ernahonal Bwlding Code Thsnks. -Mty From; John Llacuna [mailto:john.11acuna�o!synlhesispc.com] Sent: Thursday, July O5, 2007 ;:01 PM To: Meg Hafey Subjed: RE: Panattoni Development Buildings: New Commercial H� Meg, In regards to Item#2. unlimded area, we would prefer to count bwldings A and B as two buildings A 60' wide no-bwid easement between the bwld�nqs has been recorded wrth the Bmding Site Plan See attached Sheet A1 0. `�Z 7 'll _'11117