6617 ASSOCIATED BLVD BASE FILE 2018-01-02 MF Import

Itl:: P:osrUoni I)c�rlopmcntIIuildings:+*'..wCommcrcial Pagc I of2 Meg Haley -- - --- From: Meg Haley D L�iJ lp - C `�� Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3:01 PM To: Dave Tyler SubJecL• RE: Panattoni Development Buildings: A& B Mounlain View Business Center That looks great Dave Thanks! -Meg From: Dave Tyier Sent: Friday, ]uly 06, 2007 12:31 PM To: Meg Haley Subjed: RE: Panattoni Development Buildings: A & B Mountain View Business Center Meg- I did some wordsmithmg and came up with this. which would be noted as a conddion on the final BSP map "A 30-foot no-build easement must be provided from the lot line on both Lots 1 and 2. The purpose of this requirement is to allow new construction of each separate L•uilding (A & B) with a consistent zero hour fire- resistance rating at the exterior wall, based on a 30 foot minimum fire separation distance from the property line, per Table 602 in the 2003 International Building Code." The no-build easement ,hall also be shown graphically as depicted on the preliminary binding site plan map. From: Meg Haley Sent; friday, )uly 06, 2007 10:56 AM To: Dave Tyler Subfect: Panattoni Development Buildings: A& B Mountain View Business Center Dave, The customer nas requested Ihat each of the two bwldings(A 8 B) be considered separate buildings, refernng to the no-build easemenl between the buildings as parl of the binding site plan approval, see e-mad below from lhe Architect John Llacuna The Public Services/Permit Services Department would hke the binding sde plan to include, as a conAition of approval, a 30 foot no-build easement tor each separate lot(1 & 2) from lhe property Ime between lots crealed by lhe binding site plan. This binding condition on each lot allows the new consVuction of each separate building (A 8 B) with a consislent zero hour fire- resistance ra6ng at the extenor wall, based on a 30 (oot minimum fire separat�on distance from the property fine, per Table 602 m the 2003 Intemalional Bwlding Code Thanks. -Meg _ ____ --- ---- __ From: John Llacuna [mailto:john.11acuna�asynthesispc.com] Sent: Thursday, July O5, 2007 5:01 PM To: Mee Haley Subject: RE: Panattoni Development Buildings: New Commercial Hi Meg. In regards to Item #2. unlimited area. we would prefer to count buildmgs A and B as lwo buildings. A 60' wide no-budd easement between the buildings has been recorded with the Binding Site Plan See attached Sheet A1.0. y�- �i�n��no�