Laserfiche WebLink
Margaret McLeod <br /> From: Kirk Brooks <br /> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:10 AM <br /> To: Jim Venturo <br /> ��: Margaret Mc�eod; Marilyn Long <br /> Subject RE: 6611 and 6617 Associated Blvd Addressing <br /> It is bc�hersome. but il is nol a huge deal lor me. B�lh buildings are well marked and it is kind o(an out-o6lhe-way dead- <br /> end part o(Associated where lhere shouldn'i be n^�ch confusion about which building is which. VJe have permd <br /> in(ormation Ihat we witl need to change b�d Ihe plans anJ records have not been filmed yet. Utility services was trymy <br /> hard to get lhe addresses straightened out and il is a hassle (or lhem to change lhr_ir records also, which I appreciale <br /> greally, I light of lhe big-picture view o(all thr. work Ihat would need to be done on lhe tenants and owner's part and <br /> � onsidr.nng Ihe lesser amounl of inconvenienc.o it causes us, I am willing to lel lhern keep ihe addresses as ihey have <br /> thurn .in�l adjust our records. Kirk <br /> From: Jim Venturr <br /> __ -- __ <br /> Sent: Ylydnesday, Mardi 11, 2009 7:31 fda <br /> To: Kirk Brooks <br /> SubJect: HE:bGl1 and 6G17 Associated Ulvd Addmss�ng <br /> Too change now, lhe owner would have�o pay for all tenants r,os� ol s�alior�ary and websile chdnges ect. The adaresses <br /> do not maUer too ihe Pre depl Monitoring of lhe buildings cdl out bolh addresses that arn current. So as of us wanting a <br /> r,han�e i� really doesn't malh:r to�:s IS Dils a hrrve too Ao type of Ihing7 <br /> Jim Venturo <br /> Assislanl Fire Marshal <br /> Everetl Fire Departmerd <br /> Office PH#425-257-8124 <br /> Cell PH#425-754-4551 <br /> jvenWro n ci.evere�l.wa us <br /> From: Klrk Urnoks <br /> Sent (ucsday, hlarch l0, 2009 16:SN <br /> To: Jim Venturo <br /> Subjed: GG�1 and GGl7 Associa[ed E31vd Addressiny <br /> Jim, <br /> As vre discussed earlier Ous week, Ihere has been a mix up wdh Uie �ddresses (or Iwo large buildiny conslructed m <br /> Suutliwest Everelt on Associaled Blvd. One o(the buildings is complete and occupied with tenan�s who have leases and <br /> olher documentalion wilh the mixed up addressing. The olher buildinc� has the shell compleled and is working on the <br /> �enan� improvemenls and has leases sic�ned wi�h fulure �enanis. <br /> Wc previously made lhe requ�st that t�.e addressing be remedied with lhe building lo lhe north being designated the <br /> smailer number (6611)and Uie building �o the soulh be designated the large number(6617�. I previously brough�this <br /> situ�tion to Rick Rouinson and we agreed that we would make the effort to gel them lo correcl ihe building add��5� <br /> d��signalion. My review of the County's lax records indic�tcs that ihe misalignment is alsu prolilerated there. <br /> I have had a number o(cornersalions wiQi lhe owner representatives o(both buildings and lhey are very reticent <br /> regarding making lhe change. Th>y have a lot ol paper work and coir�milments based on ihe misaliyned addresses and <br /> �re requesting some lenienc��on our part. <br /> The addresses appear to be well marked on the buildings and the owners have agreed to provide addilional designations <br /> ,�s needed. Since emergency service response is a vital aspect u(building addressing, I would like some direction (rom <br /> Ihc Fire Department on how best you think we sho�tld proceed Thank you, Kirk <br /> K�rF Broohs <br /> Qly ol Fven;ff Buildinq Olhc r,�l <br /> Ph��nu �125-7.`i7-NA1 i <br /> F.ia -l7i-2.`i7-fiUS� <br /> I <br />