1717 BAKER AVE B 2016-01-01 MF Import

� _. David P. Guadalupe Appeal 4-90 Page -5- C. In or arouad 1978 the Cresaee sold the subject property to the Radke Pamily. (exhibit 1D) Mrs. Radke hae atated in a written lettet thait the 1717-1/2 Baker etructure wae not occupied at the t7me of their purchaee and that it remalned unoccupied during the Radke ownerehip. Radke has also atated that the etructure wae ueed ae storage epace during their ownerehip of the eubject proper[y. (e�chlbit 14) i H. In 1981 ttie Radkee eold the sub�ect propertq to a family nemed Sur;acu. (ezhibit 18) I. In early 1983 the Surfacea obtained a permit from the City of Everett to inetall a 100 amp electrical aervlce fur the rtructure at 1717-1/2 Baker. The service wae Snetalled and approved ae of January 20, 1983. The electrical inapection report indicates [liat it ie for "Service Only" bue also contalna the fo11ox1ng notation: "Inetall range circuit". (ezhibit 6) The Public Utility DSetrict inetalled a eeparate meter. for 1717-1/: Baker oa Jeauary 28, 1983. (ezhibit 7) J. In or around 1984 the preaent tenant at 1717-1/2 Baker moved into eald structure. (ezhihit 18) K. Ia or around 1989 the City rebuilt Fulton Avenue aad installed curbe and eldewalks. SWan worked for one of the contractore doing the road coastruction and reca]1ed the tenant a[ 1717-1/2 Duker aeking the contractor to place a curb cut �uet to the south of the building where a graveled area eziete rrhich is used for the parking of automobilen. The contractor complied. (Svau testimony and e�chiblta 20 and 21) 7. The Polk City Dlrectariee from 1956 through 1982 do not liat 1717-1/2 Baker Avenue as a residence. (ezhibite 4 and 5) The City has indlcated that che 1983 edition of the Polk Directory liefe 1717-1/2 Baker as a reaidence. (ezhibit 9) The City aleo indicates that !t hae ao kaowledge ae to whether or not the Polk Directory includes every residence in the CI[y even if the occupant of such residence does aot wieh to be included in the Dlrectory. CONCLUSIONS 1. The Ezaminer Pra Tem hae authority purauant to Section 12.A.1.c of Ordinance 69?.-60, as amended, over the parties and matter of the lastant proceeding. j 2. The only iseue properly before the Ezaminer Pro Tem ie whether or not :he atructure at 1717-1/2 Baker enjoys a non-conforming right far reaidential usage. 2.