1717 BAKER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

David Gaudalupe Appeal 4-90 Page -2- 10. Petitloa Signed by FSve Onponents to the Appeal 11. Letter dated 7-14-90 to James Driecoll from Mr. S Mrs. Cleater 17. Letter dated 7-13-90 to James Driscoll from T. C. Swan 13. Letter dated 7-18-90 to Cerry Ervine from Donald Lundstrom 14. I.etter dated 7-16-90 t� James Dciscoll from Mrs. Aibert Radke 15. Letter dated 7-19-90 to James Driacoll from Viola Oursler 16. Snohomish County Aaseasor pocumeatatlon 17. Ordinance 3572 Excerpts Pursuant to the hearing and vith the approval ot the Hearing Examiner, the fo7.lowing eahibit wae suhmittad aod is considered part of the official record of [his proceeding: 18. Letter Received 7-26-90 from Candace Youag and David Cuadalupe After due conaideratio❑ of the testimony and evideuce preseuted by the Applicant; Ceatlmony and evtdence elicited during the publir. hearing; and as the reault of the personal inspec[Son of the eub�ect property and aurrounding areas by the Everetr Hearing Examiner, the follavi¢g findings of fact and conclusiona constitute the basia o: the decision of the Everect Hearing i{ Examiner. I FINDINCS OF FACTS 1. The Appellaat is the owner of the property at 1717-1/2 Baker Avenue, Everett, Waehington. Although this property ia a aingle lot, there are trro structurea located on it. One of the structures, Sdentified as the atructure rrith the above referred to addrese, has been determined to be by the City of Everett in violation of the denaity requirements Eor the R-2 zone. The City determined that the second structure :s not a noa-confocming uae and requested that it be removed. 2. The aubject praperty is located in aa R-2 zo¢e. The Everatt 2oning Code reatricts R-2 zoned lots to one residence per lot (Everett 2on.tng Code 19.16.020). 3. The subject property was built in approximately 1923. Historically, it has been uaed as a garage, storage ahed, and an automotive repair ehop. 4. The structure at 1717-1/2 Baker Avenue firat appeared in the Po1k City Directory of the City of Everett in 1983. However, it appeara tliat the structure was conatrur_ted in the 1920's and, thus, predates the zoning of the subject property which occurred in 1956. The prevlous owners of the subject property include Jelvik, who eventually sold the property to Cress, who sold the property to Radke, r+ho aold the praperty to Surface/Jaffe. Surface/Saffe's intereat in the property was conveyed to Jaffe who ultlmately sold the subject pcoperty to the Appellant. Ttte Appellant has owned Che subject praperty for one and one-half years.