1717 BAKER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

David P. Guadalupe Appeal 4-90 Page -5- C. In or around 1978 the Creeaes sold the sub�ect property to the Radke famlly. (ezhibit 18) Mrs. Radke hae etated in a written letter that the 1717-1/2 Baker etructure was not occupied at the time of thelr purchaee and that St remained unoccupied during tl�e Rsdke ownership. Radke has also atated that che etructure wae used ae storage space duzing their ownership o£ the sub�ect property. (e�lbit 14) H. In 1981 the Radkee sold the aubject property to u family named Surface. Ce:hiblt 18) I� Everett tolinstxle aS100 amp electrical servi�e formtheest ucture at 1717-1/2 Bxker. The aervicc wae installed and approved ae of January 20, 1983. The electrical Snspection report indicatee that it Se for "Service Only" but alco containa the followSng I notatian: "Inatnll range circuit". (ezhibit 6) The Public Utility Dietrict installed a eeparate meter for 1717-1/2 Baker on Jsnuary 28, 1983. Cexhibit 7) J. In or around 1984 the present tenant nt 1717-1/2 Baker moved into naid ntructure. (ezhibit 18) K. In or arounJ 1989 the l;ity rebuilt Fulton Avenue and installed curbs and eidexalka. Swan worked for one of the contractore doing the road construction and recalled rhe tenant at 1717-1/2 Baker asking the contractor to place a curb cut juet to the south of ehe buildiag �+here a graveled area e:iete whlch ie uead for the parking of automobilee. The contractar complied. (Srra¢ testimony and ezhibits 20 and 21) 7• Baker A enuec asDaT r eide cef r� (ezhibite 4 uaad 5)BZThe City hastiodicated that the 1983 edition of the Polk Directory liaT.a 1717-1/2 Baker ae a residence. (e:hibit 9) TUe City also ind7catee that it hrie no knowledge as to whether or not the Polk Dlrectory includee every reeidence in the City even if the occupant of auch reeldence doea aot wieh to be Sacluded in the Directory. CONCLUSIOFS 1 �rdi ancei692-80� aaeemendedeLLoverithe partiestand atter�of the �instant Froceeding. 2, The only iesue properly before the Ezaminer Pro Tem is whether or not the structure at 1717-1/2 Baker en�oye a non-conformiag right for resldential usage•