1821 BAKER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

i � a. 1'indings: 'i'he applicant has stated that the neeci for the variance is t� k�uilci u car�ort next to an existiny shed which is on a cement foundation approximately lU feet from the property line on one side and 1"/ feet from the � propErty line on the other side. b. Concl.usions: '1'he existiny storaye sl�ed is I� loct�ted in the center of the rear yard area. I 1'here is udeyuate area on site te construct an i a�ldition to the existiny shed or a new structure while meetiny zoniny cocie I requirer,ents. Criterion No. 2� II '1'hat. the variance wilJ not �e materially detrimuntal to � the property in the areu of the subiect property or tu the City as u whole. a. Pind.inas: '1'he applicant has stated that the carport will nct be detrimental or deyrade in anyway the �;. _�perty or surrounding property in the area. .c will improve the appearance ot the neiyhborhood to huve a covered parkiny area. i�. Conc:lusions: Letkers received by Vicki ltosenau (23U% t•fapl��) and Matt Welborn ( 2:11% t9aplej w�re submitted at the heariny opposing thn vari�nce I request. � �ritarion No. 3 � 'Phat the variance will only yranc the subject property the same yeneral riahts enjoyed by other propert�+ in the same area and zone as the subject �roperty. a. l�indinas: 'Phe applicant has stated that the neighbors building up and down the entire a11ey are also close to the property lines. '1'hus , the proposed carport will not detract from the neighLorhood. �,, Conclusions: '1'here are many existing garayes and structures that du not meet sett�acl: reyuirements in the area. '1'hese structures existed prior to zoniny seti��ck rcyulations ancl are considered n-an-conforminy. Cr1t�r�on No. 4: '1'hat the variunce is the minimum necessury to all:�w thc subject property the generul riyhts descriLad in Cciterion � .