Laserfiche WebLink
~ l�i � (� [� � U� f� � <br /> JUL � ;;1�8i <br /> BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> ._..�.. <br /> FINDIMGS� CONCLUSIONS AMD ORDER.._ - <br /> VARIANCE N0. 3a-a7 CiTY OF EVERETT <br /> Pub:ic Works DeJ�. <br /> Based upon the uritten request fcr a varlance fYom the City's zoning code by: <br /> Richard Tucker <br /> 2214 Baker <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> herelnafter referred to a9 "Applicant," for a variance from E.M.C. <br /> 19. 16.050(B) , Side Yard, to allow: <br /> construction of a 192-square-foot additlon which Nould be 4.5 feet <br /> from the north side pruperCy line rather than the 5 f'eet required by <br /> Code. <br /> on the folloW!ng Aescribed property <br /> l.ots 25 and 26, Plock 471, Capitol Hill Addition <br /> commonly knoun as: 2214 Baker <br /> The Board of Ad�ustment, following a publlc hearing on said application held <br /> on July 6, 1987 and further having revieued all testimony, makes the <br /> folloaing Findings, Conclusions and Order: <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> �, That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br /> condltions applying to the sub�ect property or as to tne Sntended use <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> Finding: The appllcant's home Sa a 1920's vintage structure uhich ls <br /> nonconfor�ing by 6 inchns with respect to the required 5 foot side <br /> yard eetbaok from the north properLy 11nr,. The applicent wishes to <br /> extend the slde wall of the houee uith a 192-gQuare-foot additlon. <br /> If he were to build Lhe addltion to Code, !t uould necessitate an <br /> unattractive 6" �ug in the �ide wall. <br /> Conclusioni The request appearn to be reaeonab:e. <br /> Thet such variance is neces�ary "or the preservatlon and en,joyment of <br /> a substantial property rlght of the appellant posseseed by the owners <br /> of other properties Ln the same vicinity or zone. <br /> Fin�: This Ss a typical north-end structure built in the early <br /> 1920 s. Other nonconforming etructuren ot' that vintage in older <br /> portions of the ciLy have been granted variances to allow for <br /> renovation and improvement of the property by means of additions <br /> whlch may be nonconforming with respect to aetback and/or groes floor <br /> area ratio. <br /> Conclusior.. The variance would allow a {,roperty right possesaed by <br /> other similc�r home ouners. <br /> , <br />