Laserfiche WebLink
wcrk restarted and the general contractor remo�Ed the notice . <br /> Inqueries revealed that it had been determined by the City that <br /> the garage , within a foot of the site grade , had been declared to <br /> be a `basement' , thus not counted in the total height . The Senior <br /> Planner 's letter o4 October 20 , 1986 to Mrs. Boylan appears to <br /> have re—issued the permit (See Attachment H) . <br /> A `basement' as described in most dictio�aries, is the " towest <br /> story of a building, partly or wholly below ground" . ChapYer <br /> 19.04 of the City of E�erett Zoning Code does not contain a <br /> description of a Gasement in its DEFINITIONS. Thus one must turn <br /> to 19.04.010 8 22 to the definition of "Height of building" , which <br /> states Height of building' means the greatest vertical dista��ce <br /> measured from the average level of the highest and lowest polnt of <br /> that portion of the building site co�ered bY the buflding to the <br /> highest point of the roof , excepting chimneYs and staeples. " This <br /> lack of a description of a `basement' and the �agueness of the <br /> definition of the "Height of a building" pro� ide opportunities to <br /> totally defEat the intent of the code by either bringinQ in soil <br /> and raising the le�el of the building site prior to construct ! on <br /> or by constructing the buildiny and later bringing in soil to <br /> raise the surrounding grade le�el sufficiently to take ad�anta�e <br /> of the provisions for `a�eraging' the high and low polnts of the <br /> buildings footprint , thus maximizing the height of the building <br /> while remaining within the code . Attachment I contafns se�eral <br /> exhibits which indicate that the original grade level of Lots 28 <br /> and 29 has bEer� substantiallr altered by piling up soil around <br /> the building, in some areas to a depth of o�er six fee2 , thus <br /> creating a `basement' out of a grade le�el garage . <br /> Current Situation : <br /> Wi :h the re—issuance of the work permit , construction has resumed. <br /> tlodified roef trusses ha�e been put into place . Fttachment I <br /> Gro� ides further views with the trusses in place together with a <br /> computer qenerated profile o4 Bell Avenue looKing to the west . <br /> This profile is r��t to scalE but is very representative of the <br /> rooflines on Bell Avenue . <br /> With the arri �al 04 na�al and civitian personnel associated with <br /> the construction and operation of the E�erett Naval Base , zoning <br /> and new construction problems will multiply . The Homeporting Fact <br /> Sheet dated �lay, 1986, prepared by the E�erett/Snohomish County <br /> Impact Coordinating Council Board of Directors, states that 6,894 <br /> new housing units will be required by 1992. It is ob�� ious that <br /> there will be cansiderable new construction and remodeling. It is <br /> equally obvious that tY�e zoning code must be clear , concise , <br /> complete , enforceable , and enforced, in order to efriciently <br /> manage a problem that will soor� be upon the city. <br /> Recommendations: <br /> 1 . That the recent decisions bY the Senior Planner be re�� iewed in <br /> �E�.pE� t +n the oriqinul intent of Sectian 19. 14 .066 versus <br />