|
� � ''�ti:i�T
<br /> I ,�- r�.,.,;,�e;cin: � vari�'ico fr.�r �hc R-1 zoning zequirement that
<br /> .. � ; � ;.,. ,� -.�,� 1- ,;- ,;T, ,s f l�or area ratio of . 30" . The
<br /> c!,�• lir: il st�gvs of altering the zaning cade
<br /> ; ' ' � � � _�� � .- ,- . �; ; � ,;;� ; �. �;cr,��c of 305 and develop:nent coverage of
<br /> � ,' � ' , , . . ,, ,,, ; ,.;,!ia in�c which I am [old should be finalized
<br /> , , , , , , ; 1; ; � ,;;:; ; M. .: l�: o.�sily mcet ehe requirements.
<br /> „ � ,.; , ;� � � .: t .: : • 14 . � ' � , sincc thc "footprint" of the
<br /> , „ , , , . �: ty `! JS s.; . ft . Th�� dcvelopment cover wauld not exceed
<br /> � � , , . .: Id Jt' 41111 vi [hin th� thv limits of the proposed ordinance .
<br /> . : v..�.: l�i pl�ce a hardship on me to wait the extra 2-3 months to begin
<br /> r.�r.ti:ruction . I want to build during the dryer season. Also, I must
<br /> qive possession of my present residence before the end of the year to
<br /> thc new owner.
<br /> My request is for construction of a single residence with 1695 sq. ft.
<br /> of living space, 807 sq. ft. of garage and storage and 614 sq. ft.
<br /> of finished attic for a total of 3106 sq. ft.
<br /> A visual survey of properties in the vicinity of the site anc!
<br /> specifically those abutting the site indicate that existSnq nousing
<br /> has been built with gross floor areas exce�ding the present ozdinance.
<br /> My request would be consistent to the i�age of adjacent property
<br /> owners . My request would allow me to enjoy the same lot usage as t.l�ose
<br /> with existing homes.
<br /> It would be mo�t diff.icult to conform to the existing gross floor
<br /> area ratio and provide reasonable living space. Also, given the
<br /> loeation of the property, sloped lot with view of the clty and harbor,
<br /> additional difficulties and challenges of construction cannot be met
<br /> by construction bedgets relegated to a single family home restricted
<br /> to small square footage. Cost of residential lots does not warrant
<br /> the restrictive limitations. The City' s efforts to change this ordinance
<br /> reflect the City's thinking along these lines. The City has been
<br /> granting numerous variances of this sort.
<br /> By conforming to a norm which has essentially been granted to my
<br /> neiyhbors, the application cannot be deemed detrimental to public
<br /> welfare.
<br /> The variance granting has no implications which would modify or adversely
<br /> affect che comprehensive general plan.
<br /> Hasically, I am asking that you grant this variance so that I may
<br /> beqin buildina while the weather is good, raeher than waiting °or the
<br /> zcning ordinance to be completed in a few months .
<br /> ,%' ;� , , ,r� r�--
<br /> , ,� -�i,� �
<br /> r_ -� . ' " � �
<br /> �
<br /> NARRATIVE
<br /> STATEMENTIT 3
<br /> E7tRID
<br /> ;`:,.,�y}'Z1� .�
<br /> '�:�.,i` .�:
<br /> �,',.�f� �.
<br /> ' �;•' �;
<br /> � N•�
<br /> .r.-
<br /> �f:d.
<br />
|