6630 BEVERLY BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

.'. • MARCH 9, 1976 The regular meetinq of the City of Everett Board of Adjustment aas held at 7:30 p.m., March 1, 1976, in the City Nall Council Chambers, City HaTl, Everett, 47ashington. Mr. Graff presided Mr. Haird and the newly elected member, bir. Black, were present. Mr.. Berq was absent. The reading of the minutes of the previ- ous meeting was dispensed with. A hearing was held on the application of Richard Wendt, 3527 Shore Avenue, Everett, Washington, for a variance from Section 15.04.075 E.C.C. (Zoning Code) it-2, Single-Family Surburban Residential Zone, Subsection E, Yard requirements for permis- sion to construct an addition (dining area) to an existing re- sidential structure and to encroach into the East side yard setback for 2� feet, thereby providing a side yard of 5 feet rather than the minimum requirement of 7�, feet. Legal Des- cription: :..,c 5, Plat of Edgewater 3527 Shore Avenue. After considering the facts it was moved by Mr. Baird seconded by Mr. Black and unanimously'cazried to grant the applicant's request for the following reason: That it is aa extension of the variance that was granted two years ago with no substantial change to the original request. A hearing was held on the application of Mr. Robert Lundquist, Post Cffice Box 2343, Everett, TJashington, for a variance from Chapter 19.08.010 Everett Municipal Code, Land Use, Paragraph .H for.permi:;sion to divide one parcel of land into two (2) par- cels, one lot to be twenty-five (25) feet fronting a public de- dicated street rather tY.an the reSuired forty (40) feet. Legal Description: Lot 5, Block 3, North Beverly Park, Divi- eion N2. Address: 6630 Beverly Houlevard. Zoninq: R-2, Sin- gle Family High Density Residential. Mr. John Stone, who lives at 66th and Highlan3 Drive, was cen- cerned about the :ieight of the proposed buildings, the property lines, and the possibility of future rezoning for apartment construction. Mr. Shockey stated that the area was not now zoned for apar'Jnents but the Board could not guarantee that a rezoning will not be granted sometime in the future since this is not within their jurisdiction. Mr. Shockey also assured Mr. Stone of the thirty-five (35) foot heiqht limitation and the boundary of his property lines would not be influenced by the grantinq of :i variance. There was no furt:her comment from the audience. It was moved by Dir. Baird, seconded by Mr. Black anri unanimously I� carried to postpc�ne the applicant's request for thirty (30) days lto allow further study. 3 y i i