Laserfiche WebLink
the Southerly margin o� said E1 Capitan Way; thence North � <br />89°49' East along said Southerly marqin for 930.78 feet <br />to the true point of beginninq. (9021 Eastmont Shopping ` <br />Plaza - vacated pharmacy.) ' <br />After visually viewing the subject property and considering all the <br />testimony and evider.ce presented, it was moved h�; b�. Champion seconded <br />by r�. Cronin and unanimously carried to deny th� applicants request <br />for the following reasons: <br />1. This is a B-1, Neighborhood Shopping Zone where signs are <br />resLricted in size primarily because of the proximity <br />of residential homes. <br />2. The applicant should have been aware of zoning restricEions <br />prior to renting the building. No hardship exists that could <br />not have been avoided. <br />3. No testimony was offered by the applicant to indicate a <br />hardship other than he wanted the sign to be visible from <br />the freeway. <br />4. The Board car.not justify a sign with such an extreme change <br />from 30 sq. ft. (maximum size as specified by City Ordinance) <br />to 160 sq. ft. in size. <br />A hearinq was held on the application of Kenneth C. Carpenter, 6427 � <br />Beverly Lane, F.verett, Washirigton, for a variance from Section 15.04.090, <br />Everett City Code (Zoning Ordinance) to erect an amateur. radio tower <br />to a maximum height of ninety (90) feet abovc ground elevation which is <br />higher than the thirty-five (35) feet maximum permitted in an R-2 <br />Single Family High Density Residence 2one, on Lot 45, Beverly Hills, <br />Division No. 6(6927 Bev_rly Lane, �verett, Washingto�). <br />Ther.e was some objection from the audience on r1r. Carpenter's requ�st. <br />Some oL the neighbors objected to the asthetic value of an aerial <br />with this magnitude (90') of radio and TV interierence. <br />After visually vie�:�inq tlie subject proPerty and considering all the <br />evidence and testimony presented, it was moved by Mr. Cronin, seconded <br />by Mr. Champion, anc? unanimously carried to postpone the renderiny <br />of a decision on this application for further study until the <br />September 19, 1970 Public Heariny of the IIoard of Adjustment. <br />The motion was made, seconded, and unanimously carried to have the next <br />Board of Adjustment hearing September 19, 1970 because the regularly <br />scheduled hearing falls on a holiday. <br />On motion, the meeting adjourned at: 8:30 p.m., August 3, 1970. <br />F. }l. IILNNL'i'T, Secretary <br />Board of Adju�trnent <br />21/10 & 23/1 <br />