Laserfiche WebLink
No. 1169-I <br />devices or chettels, and, tahen separated by party walls <br />located upon the property lines, then each portion oP <br />s.:ch structure shall be deemed a se�arate building. <br />B(7) Buildinq, Principal: A buildinq �ohich is the <br />primary use oi the lot upon whicl� the building is located. <br />B(22) Height of Duildinq: The greatest vertical <br />distance measured from the average level of the liighest <br />and lowest point of. that port3on of the buildinq site <br />covered by the buildin, to tlle highest point of the roof <br />excepting chimneys and steeples. <br />B(32) Structure: Anything constructed or erected, <br />the use of whicti requires location on the ground or attach- <br />ment to something having location on the grouiid. <br />Paraqraph I' of § 15.04.090 reads: <br />F Height Limitations: No building shall exceed <br />thirty-five feet above the average elevation at the foot <br />of the building. <br />City Code § 15.04.3G0 defi.nes the jurisdiction of the <br />Board of Adjustment in reviewing the decision of the building <br />inspector. It reads: <br />The Board may review any interpretation of the pro- <br />visions of the zoning code made by the building inspector, <br />and any order, requirement, decisiwl, or determination <br />relating thereto, in the application of the specific <br />, provisions of the zoning code to any parcel of land and/or <br />structure. The Board may affirm or reverse the interpreta- <br />tion of the provisions of the zoning code made hy the <br />building inspector, and any order, requirement, decision, <br />or determination relating thereto; and the findings in <br />each case, and to that end it shall have all of the powers <br />of the building inspector . <br />, . . <br />(With exceptions inapplicable here.) Petitioner argues the <br />buildinq inspector correctly interpretefl the code when he con- <br />cluded that the proposed radio tower is an "accessory building <br />or use" within the meaning of City Code § 15.09.030 II(1), and <br />that such an accessory building or use is not subject to the <br />35-foot heiyht limitation described in § 15.04.090 r'. <br />The problem here is not what the ordinance means to us, <br />but rather whether the interpretation of ihe ordinance raade by <br />the Board of Adjustment was arbitrary or �apricious, dishonestly <br />reached, or reached without due considerai:ion of all,of the facts. <br />. � �,� <br />� 6 <br />4); <br />'1 �.� <br />� <br />3 . �� <br /><<� <br />