Laserfiche WebLink
_ : ._.�.....�..._:_ _ ,.,.� <br /> � � f �h c .. . _._ <br /> uW OFFlCES OF <br /> ANDERSON, HUNTER. DEWELL. BAKER & COLLINS. P. ,�i. ' <br /> 601 FIRST NqTIONAL BANK BUILDING <br /> O. O. ANDERSON �18924H6U EVERETT. WASHINGTON 98201 <br /> JAMES P. HUNTER T[�[vHOHe ¢Sx�Sro� �ne� coo[ zoe <br /> JUUAN C DEWELL <br /> WIL�tAM W. BAKER ' <br /> TNOMAfi R. GOLLINS � <br /> 0 oo�,cu�s Feacuso�: June 15� 1977 <br /> H. SCOIT HOLTE � <br /> FODERT B. WILLOUGIIBY <br /> City of Everett <br /> Board of Adjustment <br /> City Hall <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> Re: Request for Reconsideration of the Appeal <br /> of Robert A. Larson from Findings of <br /> Building Inspector dated April 12, 1977 <br /> Dear Member� of the Board: <br /> Please be advised that the undersigned represent Mr. and Mrs. <br /> Dale Sabine of 115 Bridgeway, Everett, washington, who operate <br /> Thrifty Towing. By this letter we are requestiny that yo�i, <br /> thc-Board, reconsider your oral decision on the above referenced <br /> appeal, at a special meeting to be called, prior to entering <br /> your final written Findir.gs and Decision, for several reasons . <br /> First, the Sabines are a little confused as to the full impact <br /> and effect of your decision. It appears that your decision <br /> may have the effect of prohibiting ritizens from driving their <br /> commercial vehicles to their places of residence and from parking <br /> these vehicles on the city streets . In other words, Sabines <br /> could not even 3rive their tow trucks to and from work as other <br /> persons in the City of �verett often ao. <br /> Secor.3, we believe that the Sabines were not afforded proper <br /> and sufficient notice of the proceedings on appeal before the <br /> Doard and, thus, did not have an adequate opportunity to prepare <br /> and present their case. While the appellant, Robert Larson, <br /> probably had a duty to provide adequate notice to the Sabines, <br /> neither he nor his attorney directed any notice to them. <br /> The only notice which the Sabines received was from the Assistsnt <br />� City Attorney, who sent a letter dated June 2, 1977, as a courtesy <br /> to Sabines, a copy of which is attached hereto. However, the letter <br />���' from Mr. Cattle suggests that the Sabines ' attendance is not <br /> necessary, yet substantial rights of the Sabines were to be <br /> affected. <br />