My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
225 BRIDGEWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
BRIDGEWAY
>
225
>
225 BRIDGEWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 6:19:16 PM
Creation date
1/23/2017 6:18:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BRIDGEWAY
Street Number
225
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � � <br /> _ _. <br /> o ,'�n pe --------... _ .. ....._.. ._. __. . ._._......---�--__._.__._.... _ _.._ _ ____, _... <br /> . . _._ . .___�_._ _ ._....�.. . . . <br /> t' yy ' � _� �` . ' � <br /> H�� <br /> �i f] <br /> o x o City as a whole. <br /> '�tl M M7 <br /> �z k�" Criterion No. 3: <br /> o � d That the variance will only grant the subject property the same <br /> %�g general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as <br /> p„ � the subject property. <br /> �H � a. Findings: Other properties in the area are exceeding maximum <br /> H y lot coverage and lot coverage by accessory buildings. <br /> ti <br /> c�C w - b. Cnnr>>+�;�n�- The variance will not grant additional property <br /> �� t-� rights that are not enjoyed by other properties in the same <br /> y� area as the subject property. <br /> HOcn <br /> Criterion No. 4: <br /> That the variat.ce is the minimum necessary to allow the subject <br /> property the general rights described in Criterion 3. <br /> a. Fin�inas: The property cannot have the amount of accessory <br /> buildings that other properties in the neighborhood can have. <br /> b. Conclusinns� The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to <br /> allow the property the general rights descri5ed in Criterion 3 . <br /> Criterion No. 5• <br /> The granting of the variance is not inconsistent with the goals and <br /> ���� policies of the Everett General Plan. <br /> � a. Eindings: The Everett General Plan designates the property as <br /> 1 !!�'' sinqle family detached. The house will remain single family. <br /> V� <br /> � b. Cnnclusions� The granting of the variance is consistent with <br /> ; the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. <br /> I �� Criterion No. 6: <br /> The need for the requested variance is not the result of a <br /> self-created hardship. <br /> r� <br /> a. Eindings: The applicant received erroneous information <br /> regarding the size of her lot and based on that information she <br /> � had her addition designed to meet City standards. Also, the lot <br /> � ���� was reduced in size with a portion of the property dedicated <br /> for R.O.W. purposes. <br /> -_ b. Cnnclusions: The need for the requested variance is not the <br /> �� result of a self-created hardship. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjusiment of the City of Everett does <br /> hereby order that the variance be GRANTED to allow a lot coverage of <br /> 40.2� and accessory lot coverage of 12.5�. <br /> The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRANTING a variance shall <br /> be final and conclusive, unless within thirty (30) days from the date <br /> of issuance and signing of this order by the Chairman of the Board, <br /> an aggrieved person or persons obtains a writ of certiorari from the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.