Laserfiche WebLink
I _ I <br /> � <br /> � <br /> '� <br /> � BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT � <br /> FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER i <br /> (Varianee /16-85) <br /> � September 16� 7985 <br /> I Based upon the xritten request for a variance from the City's zoning� <br /> code� specifically 19.14.050 front and rear yard setbaek� made by William <br /> Tillotson at 5800 Broadway� hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the Board ; <br /> iof Ad�ustment, following a public hearing on said application held on ' <br /> �I� September 9, 1985, and further having revieWed all testimony� makes the � <br /> ,� following Findings� Conclusions� and Order: <br /> ; ' <br /> 'j FZNDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: �i <br /> �I 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br /> � conditions applying to the sub�ect property or as to the intended use ' <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same '' <br /> ���I vicinity or zone. � i <br /> �i Findin : The lot is located in the R-1 zone and Ss 41. ' X 1?9.' The <br /> 'I property is 3934 square feet. The applicant is proposing building a � <br /> I single family residence. i <br /> ;I Conclu3lon: The exceptional circumstances of the lot are the width and �l <br /> depth along with limited land area for a building site. I <br /> i <br /> I, 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservati.n and en�oyment of a , <br /> il substantial property right of the appellant pos�2ssed by the owners ofi <br /> il other properties in the same vicinity or zone. � <br /> � <br /> �I Finding: Most dwellings L� ihe area are built with about the same <br /> setback requirements. <br /> i <br /> �II Conelusion: The application is consistent with other properties in thel <br /> area. il <br /> I 3• That the authorization of such variance will not be maturially <br /> I detrimental to the public xelfare or in�urious to property in thel <br /> ivicinity or zone in which the properCy is located. 'I <br /> I Finding: The request for a variance would not affect ad�acentl <br /> property. The ad,jacent properties are the City and the PUD � <br /> ��I right-of-Way Which are respectively 100' and 80' wide. I <br /> �� Conclusion: This pro�ect will have no effeet on ad�acent property. � <br /> 'i 4. That the granting of suuh variance will not advE.^sely affect thei <br /> Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> I Findin : The Comprehensive Plan is Single Family Residential. II <br /> i I <br /> Conclusion: This proJect will have no effect on the Comprenensive Plan. � <br /> i <br /> � <br /> � <br /> i -1- I <br /> I 1441F � <br /> I <br /> � <br />