My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5902 BROADWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
BROADWAY
>
5902
>
5902 BROADWAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 9:29:54 AM
Creation date
1/24/2017 9:29:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BROADWAY
Street Number
5902
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i � Zs� I <br /> i I <br /> � <br /> I <br /> BOARD OF ADJUSTTlIIENT � <br /> FINDINGS� WNCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br /> (Variance #g-85) I <br /> Hased upon the written request for a variance from the City�s zonin� <br /> code� spacifically 1g.14,040� A & C, made by David Brandvold at 5902 Broadxay, ' <br /> I <br /> hereinafter rePerred to as "Appli�ant�" the boarti of Ad3ustment, following al <br /> public hearing on said application held on June 3� 79g5� and further havingl <br /> reviewed all testimony, makes the following Findings� Ccncluaions� and Order: i <br /> i <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: ' <br /> i <br /> 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or � <br /> conditions applying to the sub3ect property or as to the intended use ; <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same � <br /> vicinity or zone. i <br /> a. Finding: The lot is lccated in the R-1 zone and is �5' x 45' . I <br /> The property is 3,587 sq. ft, of lot area. The applicant is , <br /> proposing to build a single family residence with an attached ' <br /> garage. <br /> b. Conclusion: The exceptional circumstances of the lot are the <br /> Width and depth along Nith limited land area for a building site. �; <br /> 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of al� <br /> substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of � <br /> other properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br /> i <br /> a. Finding: Most dwellings in the area are bui1L with about the � <br /> same setback requirements. <br /> b. Conclusion: The application is consistent wlth other propertiesl <br /> in the area. , <br /> 3• That the authorizatiou of such variance Hill noc be materially � <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the � <br /> , vicinity or zone in which the property is located. I <br /> a. Finding: The request for a variance would not affeet ad�acenti <br /> property. The adjacent properties are the City and PUD ; <br /> right-oi'-way which are respective.ly 100' and 80� wioe. I <br /> b. Conclusion: This project will have no effeet on adjacent �l <br /> property. <br /> �. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the 'i <br /> � Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> Ia. FindinA; The Comprehen3lve Plan is Single Family Residential. <br /> I� b. Conclusion: This pro�eet will have no effect on thei <br /> Comprenensive Plan. <br />�<` � <br /> k; ; <br />. <br />� � � <br /> � <br /> � <br />; i _,_ <br />, � <br /> ' � <br /> � <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.