My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6624 BROADWAY 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
BROADWAY
>
6624
>
6624 BROADWAY 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2021 1:53:57 PM
Creation date
1/24/2017 10:06:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BROADWAY
Street Number
6624
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We reviewed a publishc.l geologic map titled Distribution and Description of the Geologic <br />Units in the Everett Quadranole, Washington, By James P. Minard, 1981, United States <br />I Geological Survey Open File Report 81-248. This published map indicates that the site is <br />characterized by lodgment till sediments, with advance outwash sediments also mapped in <br />1 close proximity. In our opinion it is not unusual for site -specific explorations to disagree with <br />published regional geologic maps. Site -specific explorations should be used as a basis for <br />design. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Existing Fill - Site Layout Implications <br />Exploration boring HA -I encountered existing fill greater than 5 feet thick that is unsuitable <br />for foundaEon support. It would be possible to remove the existing fill and replace it with <br />compacted, imported structural fill; however, the resulting costs would be significant. It <br />would also be possible to support new structures in this area using a system of rock -filled <br />trenches, as summarized in this report. The most cost effective alternative would be to site the <br />new buildings in such a way that they will not be underlain by existing fill. We are available <br />to answer questions that may arise during planning of the site layout. <br />Site Preparation <br />Site preparation should begin with installation of temporary erosion and sedimentation <br />1 controls. The existing structures, foundations, utilities, and any other existing site <br />improvements in the planned development area should be removed. We are not aware of any <br />existing septic systems on -site, but if any septic systems exist they should be decommissioned <br />in accordance with ^.ounty Health Department regilations and removed from structural areas. <br />If demolition creates areas of excavation or disturbed soils below foundation grades, these <br />areas should be backfillcd with structural fill, as discussed under the "Structural Fill" section. <br />J Because: the existing structure includes a partial basement, we anticipate that there will be <br />excavations below planned foundation grades that will require structural fill placement. <br />Site preparation of planned building and driveway areas should include removal of all trees, <br />brush, debris, and any other deleterious material. Additionally, the upper organic topsoil <br />should be removed and the remaining roots grubbed. Areas where loose surficial soils exist <br />due to grubbing operations should be considered as fill to the depth of disturbance and treated <br />as subsequently recommended for structural fill placement. <br />In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and <br />should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate <br />that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the existing fill can be planned at a maximum slope <br />of 211:1V (Horizontal:Vcrtical). Temporary cut slopes in ice contact sediments can be planned <br />at 1.511:IV. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.