Laserfiche WebLink
Meg Haley <br />From: Bill Bruce <br />Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:39 PM <br />To: Meg Hatey <br />SubJect: FiE: Letter from EvCC <br />Meg, <br />Sorry that I haven't gotten back to you earlier. I wanted to concur with Kirk. We both seem <br />to think that the amount being spent on the modifications and the limited life-span uf the <br />building that requiring an upgrade to a DCDA or DCVA may unreasonable. <br />Bill <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Meg Haley <br />Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:55 PM <br />To: Bill Bruce <br />Subject: FW: Letter from [vCC <br />FYI- <br />MeR <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Kirk Brooks <br />Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:25 PM <br />To: Meg Haley <br />Subject: RE: Letter from EvCC <br />Looks okay to me. Kirk <br />Kirk Brooks <br />City of Everett Building Official <br />Phone 425-257-8815 <br />Fax 425-257-8857 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Meg Haley <br />Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 2:22 PM <br />To: Bill Bruce; Kirk Brooks <br />Subject: FW: Letter from EvCC <br />8111 and Kirk, <br />Will this letter suffice for record to waive the requirement to upgr•ade existing single <br />check detectors to double check detectors for 1001 North Broadway Avenue due to a change of <br />use tenant improvement? <br />Please respond in e-mail, so that I can summarize your responses for the customer and the <br />architect. <br />Thank youl <br />Meg <br />� <br />-----Original Message----- � <br />From: Sharon Ralston [mailto:sralston(deverettcc.edu] � <br />Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 5:12 PM ll <br />t <br />