Laserfiche WebLink
��,� o���« <br />IIARTFORD INStlR11NCE GROUP <br />1820 Eastlake Avenue East <br />Seattle, Washington 96102 <br />PORPOSE <br />WA <br />,�� <br />--� <br />I CROXFORD, LEE <br />ca �„�� <br />nqr icy antl lec� <br />l�,_aboo of Lose <br />B�.d].Y f <br />r TypC GI OfCu <br />—� Fire <br />07-29-74 <br />To determine whether the glu-lam beams would bc rcusable. <br />IfdSPECTION <br />f.i <br />�� OS-21-74 <br />iolcorio. r�i:-,"_ " —_ -- <br />77d-7AR7 <br />52FS207761 <br />Everett, WA <br />Pollcv tenn <br />; <br />i�I <br />. I, -, . <br />� +�� �' , <br />On August 16, 1974 I made a visual inspection of the glu-lam beams at the above <br />address. <br />These beams were 5;" x 16'," placed on 9'5" centers. Above the beams there are <br />2 x 6 purlins on 16 centers, above that 1 x 8 decking covered with roofing mat- <br />erial being clay roof cover. I was informed that tlte underside of the purlins <br />eaas 5/S sheet rock and aaainst the sheet rock was acoustical tile. <br />An inspection of the beams showed that there was a maximum of '�" char on each <br />side on two of the beams that are located directly over the suspected origin of <br />fire. As we moved outward, away from the source of tire, the maximum char dropped <br />off considerably. I inspected as many of the glu joints as possible to determine <br />if there was any damage in this area. I decermined that there was no damage to <br />any of the glu joints at this time. <br />� SOMMARY AND CONCLUSION <br />Per my inspection and calcualtions, the glu-lam beams will be safe to use for <br />supporting the roof structure that is now there. I might further suggest that <br />a,`ter sand biasting and cleaning of all t'.ie cliar that an inspection be conducted <br />of the glu joints to insure no damage to the joints. <br />M195 : c b <br />� ������is� <br />SEP 1 � 1974 <br />,,,_„ ,,:- <br />� �vFRFTT <br /><pt. <br />i�1. W. Sande <br />Civil Engineer <br />Seattle, Washington <br />