Laserfiche WebLink
work, work continued the ne>:t few days and <br /> I again retur.ned to the Cit}� of Everett <br /> Engineering Department to iriform them that I <br /> had not given permission for this work to be <br /> done and that the work in yuestion should cease <br /> immediately. I was at this time encouraged to <br /> sign a release a�thorizing this work to be done <br /> at which time I refused to do so. <br /> That r,s a result of the conduct of the City of <br /> �verett several topographical changes to the '• <br /> south nroperty line of my property have been <br /> made. Additional dirt has been brought in and <br /> the shouldcr of the road uow called Casino Road <br /> encroaci'Tes ui,on�my property. There :as been <br /> an unconstitutional taking of my property without <br /> just compensatzon. That in addition to the <br /> taking of property, the City of Everett has <br /> constructed a newly designed drainage system <br /> along the Casino Road which now has directed <br /> the dzainage from the Casino Road area and the <br /> Evergreen Way area onto my property. As a <br /> result of this drainage change, waters drain <br /> at an increased rate from the Casino Road and y��-s ,-; <br /> Gvergreen Way areas causing a large body of water �-,�, ,� , �. <br /> to �stand on my proper�Ey. �I7i�� or o�-f�"--;F�--- ' <br /> �•�.��' <br /> unau�Tiori--ied—mo3ifica�3on of the area drainage ..,,,,,,,,��, �+ f <br /> system, my property would not be flooded or �� �� -�•��^' <br /> receive drainage run-of to the extent that ponds <br /> or stanuing bodies of water would be created. <br /> That as a result of the drainage system inslalled <br /> by the Cii:y of Everett and the unauthorized changes <br /> to my property, there now periodically exists a <br /> � standing body of water on my property approximately <br /> i � •J, �, ,r� � � 30 feet wide, 50 feet long, and 1 1/2 feet deep <br /> ;j�� y � at i}s-aeepest �poi�;"aIT-fo my �amage. That said <br /> �:i1,J ��,�, i;l+c �`"�'�"� damages in order to repair them would cost your <br /> claimant ap�roximately $10, 000.00. <br /> 5. That the amount of dama�es claimed by claimant is as <br /> follows: ' <br /> a. Sd, 250.00 fur damages caused by the unauthorized <br /> revocation of claimant' s dumping permit <br /> b. $5, 000. 00 for the unconstitutional taking of <br /> claimant' s property without just compensation <br /> • c. $10, 000. 00 f.or the unauthorized topoqraphical <br /> chan��es to claimant' s property as weLl as the <br /> chanqe to the area drainaye system which has <br /> c�used luryc amounts of. watcr to run on to and <br /> stand on claimant' s property <br />