Laserfiche WebLink
/'-+TT1U: �UX//CE �OO�ESS H L G <br /> � .lohn (YConnor. i�n�ini�erin� Uo�rn tm��n —..__�_.__.,,- <br /> " � �l�4raig Thompson, Sewer ti�iperintendent <br /> r <br /> � � Octobcr 7, 1977 <br /> � �i, ' . 4+�''.ft't',Hfd?�ik.C��'ION � �i, �.i i ,� �n ., i��i.� �. ..., �,� , <br /> 10�J CASINO RO/� � <br /> Y�r your tcicphonc rc�quc�st of Oct�6c�r 4, 1977, I callcd lh•. Rati ('���ell and <br /> discusscd his propusnl for an insido drop connection in one of our manhol��s on <br /> Casino ]tond. 1 explained to hiin that we have generally allowed ineide drop <br /> connectione in very unusual situations only and that a decision muet Ue based (�, � <br /> on a review of the epecific details. <br /> 'Phc unusual eituations to daLe l�ave been (1) manholes which arc unusually di�ep. <br /> 20'+, or (2) manholes in bus,y stroets or intersections which are deep enou�h <br /> that inetalling an outsidc drop tvould resu7t in a significant increasc in lraffic <br /> hazard over thc oonstruction of an insido drop. I also explained to him that th��r�� <br /> are facLors which can override nny ot thc�se wiusual situations. 'Phes� fnctrn•5 <br /> conter around thc practicality of havin� access into the manholc and boin�; nbl�� I�� <br /> work in the manhole after the inside drop is constructed. <br /> lftcr revlewing the above with him, 1 was satisfied IhaL (1) the traffic on ('asino <br /> Road and the depth of the manhole was enou�h t.o justify an ineide drop connection <br /> providing the manhole was larg� enou�h and providin� that the steps werc po::itinn��d <br /> in the existing manho7e such t.hat w� would have �ccces into the manhol� with an in <br /> side drop. I havc�n't ficld cher.l<ed thc size ot the manhole but I was told that it was <br /> a 54" which should bc largc enou�h for our purposes. \Ir. Cannell did nol know tho <br /> location of thc steps so I told him that I wonld only �pprovc� an insidc d�rop conlin�onl <br /> upon a determination that the steps in the manhol. w��rc favorably ]ocated. I also <br /> informcd A1r. Canoll th.il th�• insirlo drop wonld hn��o Lo bo conslruclod p�r thr� tonta- <br /> I i��r Sl.�ndarrlti whicL �vrro dr����l��prd as p.i��l ��I' tlio tilh 11�•enue West Sowc�i- I,II) l.ist <br /> y�ar. <br /> /�s for 1ho ( 'itv intiLilliii{{ .i Si�l�� s���v��r frun� th�� m;iin in Iho pr�>p��rf�� lin��. I finin�l, <br /> � after ]ool:ing at thc soivcr charls. ihnl lhrrc� i5 ;�lri�ad}' ,�n ��xistin� sidc si•w�r fo <br /> lhis property. I also foiu�d lhat lhe ri�ason for lh�. Cnnell wantinp, to connect to tho <br /> manhole is that he eventually wante to subdivide his property and sell individual unils. <br /> 'I'o do this, he must have each unit eonnected separately to a public sewer (SecLion <br /> 14. 00. 1f30-ll City Sewcr Codc) whic`i in tiu•n requires that a sewcr main bc conatr�ict�•�I <br /> on thc prope*ty to Cil,y etandards. According to llr. Can�ll, hc has �one over this <br /> wiCh personne] in the l;n�incerin� UPpurtment and cverythin� ie o, k. Since wc app<�.u• <br /> to know what llr. Canell's intenlions are, it wrn�ld see�n that in tairness lo him, IL�� <br /> �'it,y should make sui•e thnt tho linc is constructed tu City standards so thaf, we �•;u� <br /> ;iccept it as a CitY main at some future date. This, 1 would ass�une, would incl�ul�• <br /> ,omc sort of design plans and "as builte". <br /> �>ne thing which I didn't point out to !�Ir. (',inoll, hut which should be, is tliat thi�ri� <br /> ir a 30" stccl water iransmission lin�� nn ih�� nnrth si�li� i,f ( 'a5ino Hnad «•hirh is <br /> rritic�l t� ihr N';itor sup�il�� of ta larGr �>��rli�m n1' �niitli I:��rr�•I1 . If I iu�d��rtit:in�l I�is <br />