115 W CASINO RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

�38 SeptembQr 26, 1973 from 33rd Street north by conetruction of pavement,curb and ' gutter. • Lloyd Henninq, Assistant City Enqineer, eaid the Engineer's estimate was 55 ,109 but there had been a little additional work done so the total cost of the improvement was $5 ,359.61. No proteste have been received. Noved by Councilman Dobler, seconded by Councilman Aldcroft to terminate the hearinq and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance confirminq the L.I.D. Roll was called with all Councilmen votinq yea. Motion Carried 0� Moved by Councilman Dobler, seconded by Councilman Aldcroft to adopt Reaolution No. 803 as follows: WHERF�IS, Section 227, of Ordinance 123-71, and R.C.W. 4G.61.575, provide that the City Council may, by reeolution , ' permit angle parkinq on any roadway, except any federal-aid or state highway, that ie of sufficient width to permit angle parking without interferinq with the free movement of traffic, and • wFiEREAS, the City Council, in compliance with said • Ordinance, does deaire to establiah angle parking on certain streets in the City of Everett, YOW� THER�FORE� BE IT RESOLV�D IIY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFiE CITY OP EVERETT that the following streets or eections thereof, be designated for angle parking, in accordance with S.�ction 227 ' of Ordinance 123-71, from the date hereof, until modii'ied or replaced by subaequenE resolution: The eaet side of Cedar Street from 33rd Street north to a point 300 feet north of l•he center line of 33rd Street. Roll wae called with ell Councilmen votinq yes. Motion Carried MOLfTION Roger Spraque, Public Ineurance Adjustor, appeared representinq . Pir. Van Natter, the owner of the unsafe buildiny at 115 West Casino Road. tie requested an extenaion of eix monthe f.or the demolition of thia building because a law suit had been filed against the inaurance company which would not come up for about six montha, fIe said they felt they needed the phyaical evidence • in order to come up with a eatisfactory settlement. Councilman Kinch eaid that he thought the inaurance adjustor could take adequate picturea and get adequate testimony to settle sny case and that the actual physical evidence of the house was not necessarily needed. He said the City Council was beinq asked to decide wl�ether or not the owner ehould receive a larger settlement from the ineurance company and he did not feel this type of aecision was what the Council ahould n;ake. 'They ehould decide whether it wae a safe building or not. � � ,