210 W CASINO RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

�Q K & H ENTERPRISES cReal �slate �Irmutnecnf an�J�:opeefy dl'�nna9uncnF MERB /1. HALPERN P.O. BO% ]40 JUL111N H. IUINER 6ANTA MONIC�. CIILIFONNIl1 BO�OA �/ G[N[eeL PMTN[e� Pro�a Thr� Ro��o�h �zia� aei.e<ax � 062-79 H _� i � �n� �� _: I_. , �_i ScP "'. 1979 September 1E� . 1979 _.__. �s. Celia Stron� CIT'r 0� E'��-�ETT City oF Hvecett Nu!�bc �,�or` ; u�:pt. 32Uo Cedar ::oad Everett, �Na�hington 98�01 Dear hls. Strong� It was a pleasure meeting with you at our littlP get together on SeptemUer 11 . 1979• Our architect Ls in the process of redrawing our plans to pro- vide for 25' of road alongside our propert�• and matching with the "Anderson Group" plans. It �•ill be cubmitted to you along v+ith their plan and covex• letter. In the meantime , I would like to reiterate some of the thir�s brought up in our meeting with the hope that you can help �et these thiiigs approved in a timely manner. Ac you mentioned, if we give the City 3n easement� instead of deedin�, ror the ten feet alon(r Casino Road, 1nd the twenty- five feet between properties we can still uti:.ize that square footage tiowards o�:r density count . 7n order to do i.hat and still maintain our 1�+2 - units in the moct desiral•le ^on]'iguretions 3..e. , the cluster cnncept with green belt, ve wii.l req»ire a variance on the 20-foot setback from the 50 foot road. Due to the extreme na^rowness of our property, the taking of 2�' for the road and then a 20' setback on tep of that leaves very little land for development. The aesthetic value uf that po��- tion of our property becomes lost and instead of us nrovidin� a desirable c1L�ster effect with all units hevi�g bri.�ht and cheerful .vindow exposure oi: three sides wE� csd up with a lc,�p narrow � :ip of connected units with only t.wu-side expo:;ure with one side looLi.ng out on the ror+d. i �