Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> �_ .,., � <br /> t��a � . . .�� <br /> �� �..� . � . <br /> � � ' The Boei n9 Campaf •�' page 2 <br /> ��� 78688.10/01-10233 <br /> � <br /> ��� The eight recommendatians/comments to thts p�oposal listed in the Uecember 29, <br /> $� 1987 letter are still valid with the exception of No. 2. (Dlans for the office <br /> p� and loading dock sprinkler system rere received in this submittal). <br /> � Particular attention should De paid to �ecoan�nd�tion/comments No. 1 in the <br /> y previous letter, pertaining to in-reck sprinkler installation and subsequent <br /> water supplY adequacy. Per factory MuLual standards for rack storage of , <br /> � plastics to 17 ft. high, two leve1s of in-racks are needed and should provide <br /> �� 0.30 gpm/head fran me moIf ��� fromhthe same riurA�the in�rack�demand <br /> approximately 450 gp : <br /> �� should be balanced with the overheed sprinkler demand. The hose stream demand <br /> is 500 gpm per Factory Mutual standards. <br /> He have the following recomnendations/commenu w this proposal: � <br /> 1. Pipin9 for the dry system should be adequauly sloped to fac111tate <br /> andiatnleasthl/4 inch in lOtfeet oo crosstandZfeedhmains0 feet on branch lines <br /> 2. The dry system shauid be trip-tested to assure that water can reach the <br /> quick�openingedevice�or tsystem redesigo may be�needed,lf over sixty seconds, a <br /> Subfect to the recommendations above, your proposal is acceptable. Ne are <br /> returning 3 copies of your proposal marked with our stamp of acceptance, and <br /> are retaining one copy for our files. <br /> � I Sincerel , <br /> f ��� <br /> C' I Mike Mue ler <br /> Loss Preveni{on Consultant <br /> � Seattle District Office <br /> ' �M' MMM/Jmb/2.0 <br /> log 50-1 <br /> �' <br /> 1 �1 <br /> i <br /> �� <br /> \ _ . <br />