Laserfiche WebLink
.r. <br /> � /1 <br /> a THE AUSTIN °°° '°"T"'""T '°'„ 'T. <br /> ncNTON, w� osoee <br /> COMPANY ►HOHc: soe/2ae�esoo <br /> rucz: aw•+aa•oeaz <br /> D[�IONtRs • lNGINEHNB • BUILD[RS aa�•o� •u�er�ic�Ta77na <br /> �April 3 , 1987 <br /> Ben F.dwacds <br /> City of Everetk <br /> Huilding Department <br /> Everett, WA _ <br /> Subject: Code Analysis <br /> euilding 40-05 <br /> Boeing Everett Plant <br /> Dear M[. F.dwarde: <br /> In reference to our phone conversation of April 3 , 1987, I have <br /> attached a copy of our Code Analysis for your review. <br /> We have also reaearched your questione regarding draftstopping and <br /> have summarized the following for your review: <br /> FG. 4/f d4C <br /> The building ie designed in accordanc wit the requirementa <br /> of conetruction Type II-N1 non-com_ ' Therefore, we <br /> did not intezpte� �fF"e piov s on�of UBC Section 2516 to oK <br /> Afs✓H E apply. Additionally, one-hour construction is provided at <br /> all ahaft enclosurea in accocdance with UBC Table 17-A and a <br /> Pj•2 K�+I�41t�ne-hour enclosed exit ataicway ie pcovided in accordance <br /> ���r with U9C Section 1716 9, Exception 7. The building ia fully <br /> � / " eprinklered with an ozdinary hazard rating at the mezzanine, <br /> �,G�Q'f officea, toilet room and food secvice, and extra hazard for <br /> �xj7 �dtf�� the manufactuzing/storage area with a flow rate of .6 GPM <br /> for the most remote 3000 S.F. From a practical atandpoint, <br /> we feel that our design properly addcessea the safety of the <br /> building occupants and the contenta of the building. <br /> r�T��. <br /> /� <br />