605 W CASINO RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

� 1 A. Narrative Statement 1. Detailed explenation of tho specific varlance requeat, We are requesting a ZO foot accese easement over the fmnt port.ien of the .-r property to eervice the rea•r portion of the property. 2. The following are the specisl circumetances Which apply to the property which deprive me of rights and privileges which are en�oyed by other pmpertiee in tha vicinity imder the identi:al zone claseification. The houee� even with tha garage removed� ie so located on the f=+ont of the property that xithout tha variance We are prevented from uaing the balance of the property to its maximum potentiel. If the house were removed the variance wuld be tmneceseary� hovever� thie uauld be a neodleea waete of a nice homa and valuable duelling. Similar propertles uith a house not so eituated wuld en�oy maxim� use of the property. 3. The variance requeated rdll not be datrimental to the public welfare or in�ux� ioue to the ptoperties or impmvemente in the vicinity of the wne in which the properi;y is located. The variance being aeked for does not affect eny code or requirement that wuld have any affect on adfoining propertiee. Nor does it allow a uee other than that for which the pxvperty is presently zoned. /,. If this variavice ie not grented� an unneceseary hardehip vill continue to the oWner of thie property� the cauae of which ie beyond hie contivl. The denial of thie varience requeet Would reeult in one of tuo thingss 1. that the propoeal vould bo droppod and the property would remain unueed end essen- tially waeted; or 2. that the present house wuld have to be removod or demol- iehed vhich would be extramely coetly and needleesly vast� :�. Neither alte� native seeme equitable� or in the beat interest of the Ci, or the applicant. 5, So ae not to grant a epecial privilege to me by the grantinfi of thie varlance I aubmit the following conditiona to be impoeed so as not to ceuse inconeie- tencies uith the limitatione upon other properties in tha vicinity and zone in uhich T am located. We do not believe tSe granting of thie variance could Uo coneidered to be the granting of a speciel privilego not coneidered coneietent with exieting policy� nor to be coneidered to be inconeietent xith� nor placing any limitatione on� the use of the edjoining piroperties. The reason for this ia thnt the varinnce� in eseence� hae no affect on any adjnining properties. � e,cHie i r�y L J