Laserfiche WebLink
Musolf Appeal <br /> Page -6- <br /> COMMENTS <br /> Thie decisior. has been made on facts unique to this case. It <br /> ie not made for the establishment of any precedence for Euture <br /> cases within the City of Everett. o <br /> � <br /> The compelling fact for the granting of the legal lot m <br /> certification ia that the City of Everett hae had twenty aix " <br /> yeara in which to enforce the zoning code violation of the � � <br /> substandard lot that was created by the tax segregation. The � � <br /> City has not acted in that period even though it has had the N m <br /> opportunity to do so when permits were isaued and inspections � a <br /> made. �,� <br /> -�c <br /> The Appellants and their predecessora acted on the City's � � <br /> approval of various permits throughout the years. To deny the � � <br /> Appellanta' requeat would prejudice them. 2'hey have obviouely �' � <br /> spent much time and money on this property. Without a lot c = <br /> conformance they cannot obtain insurance or r�efinancing. Their � i <br /> rights are prejudiced if the City' s administrtitive decieion was �v, <br /> upheld. '` ,� <br /> �p <br /> Thia deciaion in no way expanda the Appellants ' authority to =� <br /> further develop the property. No fucther expansion of the m.. <br /> property will be allowed. However , in case of a disaeter, the � <br /> pcoperty could be reconstructed at its pcesent density. $m <br /> c �n <br /> � <br /> Done and dated this 20th day of June, 1986 . z � <br /> -�r <br /> �� �%I. ��c622 • > <br /> - ;,f'J a <br /> % _ <br /> s <br /> z <br /> Jemes M. Dris�oll � <br /> x <br /> The deciaion on this application has been made by the eearing � <br /> Examiner based on tt�e authority granted in Ocdinance 692-80 as o <br /> amended. It is final unlesa the following pcocedure is -+ <br /> followed: � <br /> m <br /> 1. An aggrieved party has filed a written request for <br /> reconaideration to the Hearing Examiner within ten (10) <br /> working days of the Hearing Examiner 's deciaion. It is <br /> the dieccetion of the Hearing Examiner to grant or deny � <br /> ceconsideration. The final date for reconeidecation is <br /> July 7, 1986. <br /> 2. Within ten (10) working days after the Hearing <br /> Examiner ' s action on the reconsideration, the aggrieved <br /> party files a written appeal with the City Clerk's <br /> office. <br /> If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the <br /> Everett City Council for further consideration. <br /> J <br /> 1 <br /> - - -- -- _ — _. - -J <br />