5012 CHINOOK DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

� T �y �9 `� � %//?- r/1.�voo�r D�. ' eor+an or enans�r � FIIiDINGS, WNCLDSIONS AND OBD� VAQIANCB N0. 42-87 � Baeed upon the rrittea request for a variance from the CSty'e coning code by: Ryeeel Homee, Inc. 13029 Bothell Way Everett, AA 98208 hereinafter referred to ae "Applicant," for a variance from E.N.C. 19.24.040, Groee Floor Area RaCio to allow: a groee floor area ratio of .336 inetead of the .30 elloved by code oa the follwring deecribed property Lot 5, leee the eouth 88.34 feet and the south 23.78 feet of Lot 7, Blk. 2, Shore Acree Addition. The Board of Ad�uetment, following a public hearing on •eid application held on October 5, 1987, and further having reviewed all teetimony, makee the following Findinge, Conclueione and Order: VARIANCE CRITERIAs Findinge and Coaclueione: Criterion /ls That there have been e:ceptionel or e:traordinary circumetaacee or conditione applying to the eubject propertq or ee to the iatended uee thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the eame vicinitq or aonn. A. Finding: On July 6, 1987, the Board of Ad�uetment granted a • varlance for tha euDject property to allow a 15 foot rear yard setback ineteed of the 25 feet eetbeck requlred by Code. That varianca hae been appeeled to Superior Court bq an ad�ecent property ow¢er. In order to be able to begin conetruction, the applicant hae revised ehe plane to meet all , eetback and groes floor area ratio requiresents. The plens as revleeS are for the eingle fesily residence with etteched carpozt. The purcheser's of the hooe, Mr. and Nre. Rosarmr, contracted for an ettached garage rather than a cerport, thue the Applicaat is requn�ting a groe• floar area ratio variaaca !n order to enclose the carport end provf.de the garege as contzacted. The Plenning Staff le currently working on an ordinance for review by the P1enning Co�sissioa that Mould eliminnte the groee floor area ratio require�ent frw the 2oning Code. The i gross fl�oz ares ratio coneidere all floors of e building, aod the City feels e sore ressoneble way to lisit lot coverage would be to coneider only the footprints of ell buildinge, slnce ehere le a height lisitetion thet controla the nusber of floors. b. Conclueions The variance ae propoee� bq the Applicant appeare to be a reaeonable request. � L� (� L� � d � � OCT 081987 _............._................................._._._ cirv oF Evert� r�en�w«� o�t.