5012 CHINOOK DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

• ' � � a. It is my understanding that the ordinance is undergoing � change to reflect the ratio as determined by Lootprint rather than gross floor area. Sincc tlie Komarow home is of two story design, it would be rouyhly half as great of a ratio under proposed inL-erprelaL-iou. b. In order to expedite con�L-rucCion we have ubl-ained a building permit showing the garaye as a carport temporarily until ue can acheive a proper variance. Based on tl�e original information we received from the planning department we proceeded to fund the project and accept a cuatomer depoait from our purch;aCra . It vas their understandinq that the home would have a garage and it aas our underatanding that we could deliver them one. If we are not auccesaful in this regard the legal consequences could be aubatantial. 2. This variance is necessary for Lhe preservation of our customera property rights a3 possesed by other owner3 in the same vicinity. For example, Lot B which is two doors down was granted an identical request earlier this year. Therefore� we reapectfully request that you grant this variance for Mr. 6 Mra. Komarow so that they rtiay enjoy tt�e same property rights as their neighbors. 3. The granting of this reque3t will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The home is within normal aetbacks and ahall not adveraely affect the neighbora. we have been particularly cautious about preserving the aound viewa of all properties concerned. This home will be aubject to an existing recorded height restriction of 1�' which puts the roofline well below tlie city' s restriction of 25 ' . Therefore� the granting of this variance will nol adversely affect the comprehensive 9eneral plan.