Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> , '�. <br /> building envelvps without e variance, rosults in a homs without a view or <br /> Port G�rdn�r Bry. Ths elimination of windows within wrt�s b�drooms of <br /> ths house would alto rowlt irom tM desfyn. ''nie d��ipn, �ccordirq to Mr. <br /> Hurlsy, i��"flarV' and would'dr�tically d�icrsa�e ths valu�d�ny houss <br /> construcx�d an this rfts'. Mr. HurleY indicrtad that 1M APP�i�would <br /> comply with all nstrictiorn of ths CCBR's with rep�rC to h�ipht and design. <br /> The City reepondsd that it ooncurs with ths Hurl�y��poR. (Exhibit 11) <br /> 10, Ths City wbmitted thet ths aPPro�al d tM oripinN wbdivi�ion, Ssalxook <br /> Hiphlands, induded cort�Pliaras with p�obch^ical r�ports for sort�oi the <br /> tM�peo�nic�ij rsiports�ib�c�use it is loc�t�ynat ve soiL (Exh�1 t <br /> �y�j�; Ths Heariny Examiner o/the City o/Everett has jurisdidionsl <br /> aufh�ty ro hold e heerinq and to issue fhe dedsion• Thet auHwrity ls aet l�rth in <br /> EMC 2.23.0f0. 8aeed on the abov�e B►�dJn9s, the Heannp Exeminer enters the <br /> folbwin9 ocndusions: <br /> CONC_ �_� <br /> 1, The Applicant requssted epprovel of variance for a roduced roar yard <br /> aetback tor ths propertY et lot 7, Ssabrook Niphlands Subdivision, e vacant <br /> g,pp0 eqwro foot lot ot'f Chinook Drivs, Everett, Wa�hinpton• The epecific <br /> roqustt ie for� roduosd setback to ten isst in lisu oi ths 25 foot astbec�c <br /> standard. (Findinfl 1) <br /> 2. In order for a varianos to be granted within the Ciy oi Everett, certain <br /> criterie must be setieTied. A review haa bean mede that ths subdiviaion <br /> varience criterie oi EMC Chapter 18.32 ere satiafied by the proposed <br /> development. (Findinpe 3 - 10) <br /> 3. Special circumstancss exist ior the grant oi ths varience. Becouae of tha <br /> curveture irontage oi Chinook Roed and the reeultinp Iimitations oi width of <br /> lot 7, a veriance for a reduced rear yard setback tor lot 7 is necsasary and <br /> reaaonable. It providee the AppUcant ths opportunity to develop the <br /> property in a mannar that will be consietenl with othsr propartie� in the <br /> area. (Findings 3 8 4) <br /> 4. The reduction oi the rear yard eetbeck will not impac:t othsr'Properties in <br /> the area. Tha views irom lot 3 will nol bs impacted becau�e u�e Applicent <br /> will adhere to all CCSR reatriclions for height and bscau�e the slevetion oi <br /> lot 7 is significantly lower than lot 3. (Findings 10 8 7) <br /> 4 <br />